Steam calorimeters are used for measurement of steam quality also known as
dryness fraction, which is the mass of dry steam contained in total mass of steam (dry
plus wet) (Nag, 2003). Steam calorimeters are commonly used in process industries,
power plants, etc., for determining the quality of steam coming from the boiler.
When boilers were initially introduced for running steam turbines, the quality of steam
was to be checked to prevent corrosion of turbine blades due to moisture and
related problems. In textile, chemical and leather industries, where wet steam is desired
for maintaining the quality of product, steam calorimeters are used to determine
and subsequently maintain the quality of steam supplied. Various steam calorimeters
have been developed so far to measure steam quality as accurately as possible. But most
of the currently used calorimeters have some limitations.
In the present work, a complete study of steam properties has been done in
order to explore new ways to determine dryness fraction of steam more accurately.
The study revealed that the principle of steady flow can be applied to measure the
quality of steam and thus conceptualizes the initial framework. The equipment was
then fabricated to implement the conceived ideas and tested in laboratory. The
results were found to be accurate and free from any limitation as compared to
other calorimeters.
An extensive literature survey has been carried out to find the various ways
of determining dryness fraction of steam under the following context: steam
calorimeter, quality of steam, dryness fraction measurement and related terms. Literature
review reveals that commonly, separating calorimeter, throttling calorimeter and
combined separating and throttling calorimeters are used in practice depending upon
the individual requirements. But the application of electrical energy to find the
dryness fraction of steam is not well covered and thus not reported as such. A brief
account of commonly used steam calorimeters in industries (Mathur and Mehta, 2001;
and Nagaraj and Venkatesh, 2005) is as follows: |