It is a widely accepted fact that the changes in
the industrial scenario have an immense
impact on the academic initiatives of educational institutes. This is more applicable
to educational institutions imparting management education as they are often dubbed as
"factories churning out future managers". The
recent unprecedented global recession has forced companies to rethink and redesign their
policies on employee recruitment and selection.
The surging and more demanding employer expectations on employee work and
productivity has made companies to scout for people who
are more knowledgeable, multi-skilled and prepared for multi-tasking. Furthermore, there is
heightened competition as the job market is overcrowded as
a result of the recent lay off exercise by many companies. The fresh graduates have to
compete with experienced talents to begin their career
in the corporate world. The pace of hiring is
still weak in all sectors of the economy as most of
the companies have not resumed fresh recruitments. These soaring corporate expectations
and challenges have a tremendous bearing on a
wide spectrum of issues like course content,
academic delivery, industry interaction and
placement activities of management institutions.
The institutions have to embark on the task of anticipating changes in the corporate
expectations and groom the students accordingly to make
them live up to those expectations. In this
backdrop, management institutions have to ponder
deeply over the issue, "Is routine classroom
teaching enough?". However, the answer to this question
is very simple. These institutions have to
emphasize on academic advancement coupled with personality development by designing
innovative training activities. This article examines
the challenges currently being faced by the management institutions and what they need
to ensure in terms of curriculum planning, pedagogical changes, teaching methodology, etc.
If this is ensured on an ongoing basis with objectivity and commitment, it should be
possible for the management institutions to remain
attuned to the challenges of changes in the business
world and thus become capable of meeting the
industry expectations.
As stated earlier, it is crystal clear that there is a dire need to rework
and revamp the conventional practices followed at management institutes
in the light of changing and rising expectations of the corporate
world. There are many management institutes even today which are not alive to
the corporate realities. They still work with the
curriculum which is `myopic' in nature, as it fails to produce the
best future managers as anticipated by the
industry. The contents are outmoded and scope for
the development of skills, attitude and
competencies are grossly sidelined. Most curriculum
inputs dwell only on knowledge acquisition and lack
a pragmatic approach. The dictum, `Knowledge is Power' seems to be forgotten, given the
present corporate dynamics. In fact, the knowledge acquired shall be transformed into skills,
skills into competency and competency into
confidence so as to make a person `placement worthy',
suiting the needs of the corporate world. People with
a positive work attitude, multi-skilled and
prepared for multi-tasking can easily make an entry into
the corporate world. But as outlined earlier, it
is disheartening to mention that most of the institutes have failed to produce students who
are competent enough in terms of knowledge,
skills, attitude, values and habits to survive and
succeed in the corporate world. Therefore, it has
become imperative for the management institutions to
scan the business environment, discern the changes
and challenges, fine-tune the curriculum and make it `market driven' to meet the pressing needs of
the corporate. Some of the expectations and
challenges emanating from the present ongoing changes in
the industrial scenario are discussed below.
Business undertakings, especially in industries like
banking, financial services, insurance and retailing, look for students with sound
conceptual knowledge. Therefore, students need to be
fully conversant with the contemporary concepts
which are in wide usage in these industries. For
instance, students aspiring to start their career in
banking industry should be familiar with basic terminologies as NPA, PLR,
CAR, CRR, etc. Usage of these terminologies without sound understanding
may spell problems for the students in their work life. Therefore, the
challenge before the academic institutions is to cover those topics in the
curriculum and narrate or interpret these concepts with a pragmatic approach. |