Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Environmental Sciences
A Comparison of Production of Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant by Two Different Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Various Economical Nutrient Sources
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The high-level production of rhamnolipid biosurfactant is a unique feature of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The rhamnolipid produced by P. aeruginosa strains is often a mixture of several homologues. This study was aimed at the development of economical methods for higher yield of rhamnolipid by suggesting the use of low-cost raw materials. It was reported that the use of economic substrates such as hydrophobic wastes like used fried vegetable oils and agro industrial wastes helps in reducing pollution caused by them. The effect of two carbon sources were examined for rhamnolipid production. In this study, two strains of P. aeruginosa, acquired culture, J1 and isolated culture, J2, were used to optimize a substrate for maximum rhamnolipid production by varying carbon sources like groundnut oil and glycerol along with four nitrogen sources (NaNO3, NH4NO3, NH4Cl, and yeast extract). J1 strain produced rhamnolipid yield of 5.22 and 3.61 g/L with fried groundnut oil and glycerol respectively when used as carbon sources. J2 strain produced rhamnolipid yield of 5.28 and 3.65 g/L with groundnut oil and glycerol respectively. Meanwhile, NaNO3 appeared to be the preferable nitrogen source, resulting in a rhamnolipid yield of 6.3 and 6.2 g/L for J1 and J2 strains respectively. The effect of C/N ratio on rhamnolipid yield was also studied using groundnut oil as carbon source and NaNO3 as nitrogen source. The optimum C/N ratio of 26 was obtained with the rhamnolipid yield of 7.2 g/L and 7.4 g/L for J1 and J2 strains respectively.

 
 
 

The use of surfactants in almost every sector of modern industry reveals their importance in the industrial chemical production. Surfactants are surface-active compounds capable of reducing surface and interfacial tension between liquids, solids and gases (Desai and Banat, 1997). Though chemical surfactants are widely used in many industries, they are a cause for concern because of their low biodegradability and high toxicity to the environment. Increase in environmental awareness about chemical surfactants paved the way for the production of biological surfactants as a possible alternative (Christofi and Ivshina, 2002). The most important advantage of biosurfactants is probably their being ecologically acceptable. Biosurfactants are biodegradable and can be produced from renewable substrates (Fiecther, 1992). Microbial surfactants are surface-active metabolites produced by microorganisms when grown on water miscible or oily substrates: they either remain adherent to microbial cell surfaces or are secreted in the culture broth. They possess the characteristic property of reducing the surface and interfacial tensions, using the same mechanisms as chemical surfactants.

Nowadays, the use of biosurfactants has been limited due to the high production cost. Nevertheless, biosurfactants can be produced with high yield by some microorganisms, especially Pseudomonas species. Pseudomonads are the best-known bacteria capable of utilizing hydrocarbons as carbon and energy sources and producing biosurfactants that enhance the uptake of such immiscible hydrophobic compounds (Al-Tahhan et al., 2000; Beal and Betts, 2000; Noordman and Janssen, 2002; and Rahman et al., 2002). Rhamnolipid compounds are frequently the main biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a mixture of mono—and dirhamnolipids, which have quite different physico-chemical properties (Benincasa et al., 2004). Rhamnolipid can reduce surface tension of water from 72 mN/m to 30 mN/m (Arino et al., 1996; Abalos et al., 2001; and Ron and Rosenberg, 2001) with a critical micelle concentration of 50-65 mg/L (Mata-Sandoval et al., 1999). Although rhamnolipid is an effective biosurfactant and is well suited for applications in bioremediation of oil pollutants (Mulligan, 2005), the major hurdle for commercial application of the biosurfactant has been the low yield and high production cost (Yu-Hong et al., 2005). Therefore, there is an urgent demand to develop an efficient biosurfactant producer and a cost-effective bioprocess for the production of rhamnolipid.

 
 
 

A Comparison of Production of Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Various Economical Nutrient Sources, Groundnut oil, Glycerol, immiscible hydrophobic, surface and interfacial tension, mono—and dirhamnolipids, oil pollutants, physico-chemical properties.