According to Sumiani and Asila (2005), during the 1960s, noise pollution
was generally not considered a serious environmental issue.
However, a massive public opinion survey conducted in
the US in the early 1970s revealed that the public
ranked noise pollution as a serious problem, but noise control advocates were unable to
develop the same type of organized constituency that
evolved to support clean air and water.
The reason is that noise is a subjective experience and it does not remain in
the environment for an extended period. In Malaysia, very few studies and researches
have been conducted on the subject of noise pollution.
This is because awareness regarding noise pollution is still low. Noise has been tended to be accepted as
the necessary price of development.
Rapid population growth is one of the reasons for
the increasing noise problem.
As population increases, the requirements for goods, services and transportation
also increase. More and more urban highways and railways have been and continue to be
built with growing demand for public transportation. This study will only focus on the
railway noise. Railways are entering a new era of higher speeds and higher
capacities, both for intercity and urban systems, and are set to play their part in reducing the
environmental burden caused by the growth in road transport (Thompson and Jones, 2000). A
railway has an important role as one of the typical public transportations. According to
Wu (2008), railway is seen as a means of environmental-friendly transportation
by providing clean and efficient mass transit. The
residential environment along the railway lines has been affected by noise and vibration, and has been recognized as a social
problem (Yohzoh and Kazuhiro, 1991). However, railway noise is regarded as one of the
least offensive forms of transportation noise, if compared to traffic noise with relatively
few complaints arising from normal operations (Shield et al., 1989). |