Equipment maintenance has traditionally been viewed as a separate entity outside
of the manufacturing process. When organizations began to identify the role
of maintenance in the manufacturing process, a gradual shift in thinking occurred.
The culmination of change from a reactive/corrective maintenance to one that is
based on preventive maintenance through predictive maintenance is the process of
Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) (Pophaley and Tiwari, 2007).
TPM brings maintenance into focus as a necessary and vitally important part of
the business. It is no longer regarded as a non-profit activity. Down time for maintenance
is scheduled as a part of the manufacturing day and, in some cases, as an integral part of
the manufacturing process. TPM combines the American practice of preventive
maintenance with the Japanese concept of total quality control and total employee involvement.
The result is an innovative system for equipment maintenance that optimizes
effectiveness, eliminates breakdowns and promotes autonomous maintenance by operators and
small cross functional teams through day to day activities. In
TPM, the machine operator has also been responsible for the maintenance of the machine to some extent, as well as
its operation. The implementation of TPM can generate considerable cost savings
through increased productivity of the machinery. The greater the degree of factory automation,
the greater the cost reduction generated by TPM. In the present
study, it has been tried to find out the appropriateness of using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) as the only
and sufficient resultant methodology of evaluating the implementation effectiveness of
TPM, and then, offsetting the shortcomings of the present method by presenting a new model.
It is the basic measure associated with TPM. In the existing system, OEE has
been used for measuring implementation effectiveness of TPM. OEE has been used as
one of the most important `maintenance matrices' since TPM came to the US in the
late 1980s. OEE grew out of the `Japanese Quality Revolution' in the 1950s, 1960s
and beyond (Williamson, 2004). OEE is used as a yardstick to measure how well the
plant and its equipments are used and is determined relative to a variety of losses that
limit the effective use of equipment. The use of OEE allows combining the
operation, maintenance, and management of manufacturing equipment and resources. |