Research and theory in Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation are at
a very early stage in the west (Sitkin et
al., 1996; and Dale et al., 2000; cited
in Thiagaragan et al., 2001). As for studies done in Malaysia, it is much greener
(Lian and Hal, 2001). In addition, research involving TQM usually focuses on
common existing western literature (Saraph et
al., 1989; and Agus, 2001; 2004 and Augus and Abdullah, 2000), and very few focus on a certain model or a nation's practice such
as the Japanese way (Sila and Ebrahimpour, 2002).
Focusing on Malaysia specifically, lack of empirical research is the main
impetus for this study. Past research, though few, were mainly concerned with either TQM
or Japanese management separately. The former usually dwells into TQM's critical
factors; impact of TQM on performances; and/or TQM on certain industries or countries
(Idris et al., 1996; Abdul Aziz et
al., 1998; Agus, 2001 and 2004; Agus and Hassan,
2000; Lau and Idris, 2001; Eng and Yusof, 2003). While the latter focus on
comparative studies between Malaysia and Japan with concerns such as on the transferability
of Japanese soft technology (Awang, 1997); and the Japanese style in HRM
(Abdullah and Keenoy, 1995).
This paper is the continuation of the author's attempt to look into aspects of
Japanese Management Style (JMS) and practices of TQM the Japanese way
simultaneously; investigating their relationship in the
Malaysian context. The author has suggested on the existence of JMS's essence in Malaysian companies. The findings
suggests that JMS plays a passive role in improving organizational performance via
TQM (Shaari, 2007a), which lead to the proposal of AFC's model for a strategic
adaptation of JMS and TQM (Shaari, 2007b). |