Price discovery and volatility transmission between spot and futures markets have
received considerable attention from academics, policy makers and regulators for the following
reasons. First, the issue is linked to information efficiency and arbitrage. Second, futures markets
provide tools for price discovery of underlying assets, in which case futures prices should have
useful information about succeeding spot prices, beyond that already embedded in the current
spot price. Finally, the nature of volatility transmission between markets is also important for
policy makers. The issue is significant from the financial stability perspective (a large shock in
one market may have a destabilizing effect on the other market) and linkages across markets
may have an impact on policy effectiveness. In addition, policy makers can design more
effective policies if they are able to measure the depth and duration of the impact of any policy
initiative in one financial market on other markets. Hence, it is important to study the price discovery
and volatility spillover between spot and futures markets.
The price discovery between stock index and stock index futures has been the
subject for many studies, which broadly found that price discovery appears first in futures
market and is then transmitted to the spot market
(Herbst et al., 1987; Kawaller et
al., 1990; Chan et al., 1991; Lien and Tse, 2000; Yang
et al., 2001; and Raju and Karande, 2003). This price discovery function implies that prices in the futures and spot markets
are systematically related in the short run and/or in the long run. In the cointegration
jargon, the price discovery function implies the presence of an equilibrium relation binding
the two prices together. If a departure from equilibrium occurs, prices in one or both
markets should adjust to correct the disparity. |