June '21
Amazon Web Services' Efforts Toward Green Computing
Koti Vinod Babu
Research Associate, IBS Case Research Center, IBS Hyderabad (Under IFHE - A Deemed to be
University u/s 3 of the UGC Act, 1956), Hyderabad, Telangana, India. E-mail: vinodbabu@icmrindia.org
Namratha V Prasad
Faculty Associate, IBS Case Research Center, IBS Hyderabad (Under IFHE - A Deemed to be University
u/s 3 of the UGC Act, 1956), Hyderabad, Telangana, India. E-mail: v.namratha.prasad@icmrindia.org
The case discusses the ef forts made by leading cloud service provider Amazon Web
Services (AWS), a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon), to adopt green computing
practices in its operations. The case starts out by going into the reasons for the high
level of carbon emissions attributed to the data centers of many cloud platforms that
include a rapid addition of capacity and usage of power from dirty energy sources.
The case then provides an overview of the green computing practices undertaken by
AWS through power purchase agreements with producers of renewable energy and
usage of equipment to boost energy efficiency at its data centers. Though different
Information Technology (IT) companies have taken up many activities to reduce their
carbon footprint, it is believed that each one of them, including AWS, has a long way
to go to become completely green. While Jef f Bezos (Bezos), Founder and CEO of Amazon,
was confident that the green computing measures deployed by AWS were contributing
to environmental sustainability to a high extent, non-governmental environmental
organizations such as Greenpeace begged to dif fer. Can Bezos continue showcasing
the current green computing measures of AWS to stave of f pressure from not only
Greenpeace, but also his employees in the long term? Or will he be forced to do more?
In addition to the environmental benefits inherently associated with running applications in the cloud, investing in renewable energy is a critical step toward addressing our carbon footprint1 globally.2
- Kara Hurst, Vice-President of Su st ainability
at Amazon.com, Inc. in March 2020
? Alex Eaton,
Co-founder of Sistema Biobolsa
Introduction
On March 12, 2020, US-based multinational technology company Amazon.com, Inc.,
(Amazon)3 announced four new renewable energy projects in Australia, Spain, Sweden,
and the US that would power the data centers of Amazon's subsidiary Amazon Web
Services (AWS). These projects were also expected to support Amazon's commitment to reaching 80% renewable energy by 2024 and 100% renewable energy by 2030, on its
path to achieving net zero4 carbon emissions by 2040.5
Major tech companies such as Amazon had taken such steps to reduce their carbon
footprint by installing green energy infrastructure to power their operations. The
four projects constituted Amazon's first renewable energy project in Australia, second
in Sweden, second in Spain, and 11th in the US. Collectively, they were expected to
produce almost 300 MegaWatt (MW)6 of additional renewable capacity and
approximately 840,000 MegaWatt hour (MWh)7 of energy annually, or enough to power
more than 76,000 average US homes.8
Globally, Amazon had 86 renewable energy projects that had the capacity to generate
over 2,300 MW and deliver more than 6.3 million MWh of energy annually. Kara
Hurst (Hurst), Vice-President of Amazon Sustainability, said, "These new renewable
energy projects are part of our road map to 80% renewable energy by 2024 and 100%
renewable energy by 2030. In addition to the environmental benefits inherently
associated with running applications in the cloud, investing in renewable energy is a
critical step toward addressing our carbon footprint globally."9
For several years previously, Amazon had been taking measures to reduce its carbon
footprint to be a part of the global endeavor to arrest climate change. Its various
actions included enabling renewable energy projects, taking up innovation at its
facilities, and increasing usage of equipment to boost energy efficiency.
The company was especially keen on implementing these measures at the AWS
data centers, as the Interna tion al Energy Agency10 estimated that data centers
consumed about 1% of the ''s entire electricity supply-and as more and more
critical processes became digitized, it was exp ected to on ly increase fur ther.11
Consequently, instead of using fuel, AWS began using green energy such as wind,
hydro, or solar power as a component of its energy resources.
However, environmental organization Greenpeace12 criticized the operations of AWS
saying that it was not doing much for environmental wellbeing and it was not open in its actions for green computing. Can Amazon's CEO Jeff Bezos (Bezos) prove through
his actions that AWS was keen on reducing the carbon footprint of its operations,
especially at its data centers?
About Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Launched in July 2002, AWS was a subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) that
offered on-demand cloud computing platforms to individuals, companies, and
governments, on a metered pay-as-you-go basis. Instead of buying, owning, and
maintaining physical data centers and servers, companies could access technology
services such as computing power, storage, and databases, on an as-needed basis from
a cloud provider like AWS.
These services were operated from massive data centers located around the '.
AWS divided its data centers by 'regions' and 'availability zones'. Its servers were spread
across 12 regions 'wide, each with availability zones consisting of one or more
data centers. Each AWS region was a separate geographic area, like EU (London) or
US West (Oregon). AWS offered 175 fully featured services from its data centers globally.
In November 2004, the first AWS service was launched for public usage. It was
called Simple Queue Service13 (SQS). Thereafter, the Vice-President of IT infrastructure,
Chris Pinkham, and Lead Developer, Christopher Brown, developed the EC2, which
went on to become highly popular. Another popular service was the Amazon Simple
Storage Service14 (Amazon S3).
AWS primarily served client-side applications. According to Amazon, as of 2019,
the number of active AWS users exceeded 1,000,000.15 AWS's customers included the
fastest-growing start-ups, the largest enterprises, and leading government agencies.
AWS provided customers access to Amazon's technology infrastructure so that they
could leverage it for any type of business. It offered services for a broad range of
applications including networking, analytics, machine learning, and Artificial
Intelligence (AI),16 apart from security, application development, deployment, and
management (see Exhibit I).
AWS was developed using a combination of Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS),17
Platform as a Service (PaaS),18 and packaged Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings.
While SaaS was the largest cloud service in terms of spend, IaaS was projected to be
the fastest growing market with a CAGR of 20% plus over the next 3 to 4 years19 (see
Exhibit II). According to Statistica,20 AWS had a market share of 47.8% in the IaaS
sector, along with a share of 25.2% in the PaaS arena as of January 2020.
AWS's net sales amounted to $35 bn for the year-ended December 31, 2019
(see Exhibit III).21 In terms of revenue, AWS dominated the public cloud market with
revenue growing at 35% as of Q3 2019.
Position of AWS in the Public Cloud Space
The benefit of using cloud computing services was that firms could avoid the upfront
costs and difficulties of owning and maintaining their own IT infrastructure, and pay
instead for just what they used and when they used it. The growing demand for cloud
services indicated that companies were letting go of their own data centers and moving
their application workloads to the cloud. Customers used AWS to lower costs, become
more agile toward research, and innovate faster.
Companies like AWS, Google Cloud Platform,22 and Microsoft Azure23 were the primary players in the industry. According to the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA)24 report, AWS was the most popular public cloud25 infrastructure platform, comprising 41.5% of application workloads in the public cloud (see Exhibit IV). Public cloud providers such as AWS needed to adhere to strict compliance protocols and maintain industry-compliant cloud infrastructure such as HIPAA and PCI-DSS standards.
About Green Computing
Green computing or Green IT referred to practices and technologies for designing,
manufacturing, using and disposing of computers, servers, and associated devices
such as monitors, printers, storage devices, and networking and communication systems
to minimize impact on the environment.26 As of 2020, Information Technology (IT)-related
activities were believed to contribute to about 2% of the ''s greenhouse gases.27
Analysts felt that reducing power consumption was a high green computing priority.
As companies deployed hundreds or thousands of servers, huge amounts of power
were required to operate and cool them. Some organizations spent more money to cool
their servers than on leasing or purchasing them, as the heat generated from
functioning servers had the capability of causing a failure of the said servers.
Consequently, companies were compelled to pay not only for powering their servers,
but for cooling them down as well. All the power consumption increased corporate
costs and resulted in a negative impact on the environment.
Green computing also involved reduced resource consumption and proper disposal
of electronic waste (E-waste). E-waste affected nearly every system in the human
body because the materials that it was made up of contained an excess of toxic components, including mercury, lead, cadmium, polybrominated flame retardants,
barium, and lithium. Even the plastic casings of electronic products contained polyvinyl
chloride. The health effects of these toxins on humans included birth defects and
damage to various organs including the brain, heart, liver, kidney, and the skeletal
system. They also had a significant negative effect on the human body's nervous and
reproductive systems.28
The IT industry did bring in several protocols to reduce the negative impact of
electronic waste on the environment. In 1992, the US Environmental Protection
Agency29 launched Energy Star, a voluntary labeling program that was intended to
endorse and identify the energy efficiency of monitors, climate control apparatus, and
other technologies. That resulted in the extensive adoption of the sleep mode option30
in consumer electronics. At the same time, the Swedish organization TCO
Development31 launched the TCO Certification program to promote low magnetic and
electrical emissions from Cathode-Ray Tube32(CRT)-based computer displays. The
program was later expanded to include certification criteria on energy consumption,
ergonomics,33 and the use of hazardous materials in construction.
Analysts opined that emerging IT technologies, existing practices, and algorithms
needed to be redefined for energy-efficient and sustainable operations. Moreover, they
felt that IT technologies had a responsibility to limit the energy consumption and
carbon footprint of other industries and organizations, while facilitating green
environmental practices in their daily operations. With the rise in energy consumption,
global warming, and e-waste, the idea of green computing was being seriously
contemplated by both the government agencies and private companies, as part of good
practices for sustainable development.
Need for Green Computin g in Cloud Services
There was no doubt that AWS-enabled its customers to become green and reduce their
carbon footprint. According to AWS, a typical large-scale cloud provider achieved
approximately 65% server utilization rates versus 15% server utilization rates for the
on-premises servers of companies. This meant that when companies moved to the
cloud, they typically functioned with less than one-fourth of the servers they operated
with on their company premises.
Customers only needed 16% of the power with which they were operating their onpremises
infrastructure when they shifted to the cloud. That represented an 84% reduction in the amount of power they consumed. In addition, a typical on-premises data
center was 29% less efficient in the use of power than a typical large-scale cloud provider
that used '-class facility designs, cooling systems, and workload-optimized equipment.34
The enormous development in energy efficiency on the cloud was resulting in a
huge drop in the negative impact on the climate, because less energy consumed meant
fewer carbon emissions. This particular scenario persuaded large scale companies to
go in for cloud services, instead of maintaining their own data centers. AWS claimed
that on an average, AWS customers using the AWS Cloud used 77% fewer servers and
84% less power and utilized a 28% cleaner power mix, achieving a total reduction in
carbon emissions of 88% than when operating their own data centers.35
However, it was cloud service providers like AWS who needed to become greener.
Cloud services involved a physical network of many computer servers installed in
data centers all over the '. The servers in these data centers needed enormous
amounts of energy to operate.
Usually, the energy was generated by non-renewable (coal, natural gas, nuclear)
or renewable (wind or solar) energy sources. According to the experts, globally,
temperatures, droughts, storms, and floods were increasing, largely due to the usage
of dirty energy (energy generated by burning fossil fuels like coal and natural gas).
While climate change could have anecdotal implications depending on the region,
experts felt that the continued use of dirty energy by cloud data centers was
exacerbating environmental problems.
Data centers such as those used by AWS to power its computing infrastructure
and host cloud services operated 24/7 to facilitate online browsing, streaming, and
communication, and required a remarkable amount of electricity to keep them running
smoothly and securely. The rising demand for internet-based platforms and services
had resulted in an enormous expansion in both the size and number of data centers,
making them one of the largest consumers of electricity globally.
According to the Department of Energy,36 data centers accounted for about 2% of
all electricity use in the US.37 Furthermore, 4.5% of global electricity consumption in
2025 was expected to be attributed to data centers. This underlined the need to look at
ways to curtail their consumption. According to the Environmental Protection
Agency,38 by 2020, the carbon emissions from data centers in the US would have
quadrupled to 680 million tons per year, accounting for more than the aviation industry.39
Furthermore, while the internet had global reach, analysts opined that the quick
expansion in data centers had not been evenly distributed. Data centers were highly
concentrated, causing a considerable increase in local electricity demand in certain
places across the '. According to experts, 70% of the ''s internet traffic
passed through data centers installed in a single county in Northern Virginia in the
US, which was called "data center alley". The largest data center hub in the ',40
this was home to more than 100 data centers and had more than 10 million square
feet of data center space. However, analysts observed that dirty energy still powered
most of the internet traffic at that hub.
Green cloud architecture was one of the latest developments of the green computing
concept. The aim of this unified solution was to provide both customers and cloud
providers with high-level architecture that supported energy-efficient service allocation
using cloud technology (see Exhibit V). The goal was to satisfy the demand for highlevel
computing services on the cloud customers' side and save energy on the cloud
service providers' side through the green cloud infrastructure.
Amazon 's Bid to Become Green
Observing the urgent need for green computing, top global IT companies like Google
LLC, Facebook Inc., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Intel Corporation, Dell Inc.,
Salesforce.com, Inc., and Cisco Systems Inc., etc. had adopted several green computing
processes (see Exhibit VI). Many of them took steps to secure renewable sources of
power, which was expected to keep investors happy as it demonstrated the companies'
commitment to reducing carbon emissions and tackling climate change.
In the year 2018, Amazon was accountable for 44.4 megatons of carbon emissions,
which was as much as Finland had emitted that year.41 Most of those were third-party
carbon emissions that included packaging and transportation of Amazon goods and
emissions from business travel. Amazon itself set out a policy to reach net zero 10
years ahead of the Paris Agreement's42 2050 schedule, a goal enshrined in its Climate
Pledge policy launched in 2019. Hurst said, "In addition to the environmental benefits
inherently associated with running applications in the cloud, investing in renewable
energy is a critical step toward addressing our carbon footprint globally."43 As part of
that pledge, AWS undertook different green computing processes at its data centers.
In 2014, Bezos announced a long-term commitment to powering all of Amazon's
data centers with 100% renewable energy. According to AWS, it was investing in
green energy initiatives and was motivated to commit to an ambitious goal of 100%
use of renewable energy by 2040. It was doing this with the support of smart
environmental policies and was leveraging the expertise in technology that led to
sustainable improvement. In this endeavor, AWS's initiatives included enabling
renewable energy projects, ongoing innovation in its facilities, and increasing usage
of equipment to boost energy efficiency.
Furthermore, Amazon associated with different environmental groups in the US.
It advocated at the federal and state levels for policies aimed at creating a favorable
renewable energy environment that incentivized investment in utility-scale solar energy
projects. Peter DeSantis, Vice-President, Infrastructure, AWS, said, "We continue to
ramp our sustainability efforts in areas where availability of renewable energy sources
is low or proposed projects are stalled, and where the energy contribution goes onto
the same electric grid that powers AWS data centers."44
In April 2016, Amazon joined Apple, Google, and Microsoft in filing an Amicus
Brief45 that supported the continued implementation of the US Environmental
Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan (CPP)46 and discussed the IT industry's rising
aspiration for affordable renewable energy across the US.
AWS' Green Computing Practices
An industry expert, Jonathan Koomey, mentioned three metrics to assess the relative
greenness of different clouds, namely, the efficiency of a data center's infrastructure (lights, cooling, and so on), the efficiency of its servers, and the source of its electricity.
AWS mentioned that carbon emissions at a data center were a factor of three things:
the number of servers running, the total energy required to power each server, and
the carbon intensity of the energy source used to power those servers.
To further reduce its carbon footprint, AWS banked heavily on a tool known as
Renewable Energy Credit (REC), which was basically a token representing a utility's
green energy generation. Industry experts observed that only a small portion of each
cloud company's energy came directly from solar or wind installations; the rest came
from RECs.
Power Purchase Ag reements
A critical measure of a data center's greenness was the source of its energy. AWS
provided a map illustrating which of its data centers ran on green energy and which
did not (see Exhibit VII). AWS entered into Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)47
with power companies to procure green energy to power its data centers.
In 2014, AWS teamed up with Pattern Development48 to build and operate the 150
MW Amazon Wind Farm Fowler Ridge in Indiana. As of January 1, 2016, Amazon
Wind Farm Fowler Ridge was live and was producing electricity. In June 2016, AWS
and Dominion Energy, Inc. (Dominion)49 associated on a renewable energy delivery
agreement. As per the agreement, Dominion would manage and assimilate the energy
produced from various Amazon wind and solar farm projects on the grid that served
AWS data centers.
AWS had a solar project, Amazon Solar Farm US East, an 80 MW facility in
Accomack County, Virginia, which began production in October 2016. In November
2016, AWS announced five new solar farms across the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Amazon worked with developers Virginia Solar LLC50 and Community Energy Solar,
LLC51 on the projects. It further collaborated with an affiliate of Dominion to own and
operate the solar farms in the long term.
By December 2016, the five solar farms of AWS star ted operating in t he
Commonwealth of Virginia. Denver Riggleman, Virginia Congressman, said, "I
applau d Amazon for their investmen t in renewable energy projects in the
Commonwealth of Virginia. This solar energy project will generate 65 megawatts of
renewable energy, which will create clean jobs for the region."52 Together with Amazon
Solar Farm US East, th e six solar far ms brought 260 MW of renewable energ y
capacity on the grid.
In 2018, AWS said it had made a lot of progress in its sustainability commitment,
and exceeded 50% of renewable energy use.53 By the end of 2019, AWS had nine
renewable energy farms in the US, including six solar farms located in Virginia and
three wind farms in North Carolina. AWS was planning to add three more renewable
energy projects, one more in the US, one in Ireland, and one in Sweden. Once
completed, they were expected to produce approximately 2.7 GW of renewable energy
an nu ally. These solar f acili ties were expected t o sup ply energ y t o Ama zon's
fulfillment network in Europe, as well as the AWS data centers.
Energy-Saving Systems at the Data Centers
AWS put special focus on environmental considerations at its data centers, right from
site selection and construction to operations and sustainability. It took utmost care
to choose its data center keeping in mind environmental risks such as flooding, extreme
weather conditions, and seismic activity. AWS proactively prepared for possible
environmental threats like natural disasters and fire.
For this, it installed automatic sensors and responsive equipment to safeguard the
data centers. For instance, water-detecting devices would alert employees to catch water-related disasters and automatic pumps would remove liquid and prevented
damage. Likewise, automatic fire detection and control equipment reduced risk and
notified AWS employees and firefighters about any incident of fire.
To reduce inefficiencies in the hardware and software running in the data centers,
AWS ran virtual machines on the servers to limit downtime; it was also committed
to automation software. Software automation-enabled IT experts to maximize the
traditional utilization and consolidation ratios at the data centers. The higher the
ratios, the less the physical infrastructures needed.
Efficient Water Management
AWS focused on efficiency and innovation in its data centers to develop operational
quality and reduce the negative impact on the environment. It implemented different
initiatives to improve water use efficiency and reduced the use of drinking water for
cooling the data centers. AWS developed a water utilization strategy by analyzing
climate patterns for each AWS region, local water availability, and the prospect of
conserving drinking water sources. AWS incorporated direct evaporative technology54
for cooling its data centers, thereby considerably reducing energy and water
consumption.
For instance, outside air was directly supplied to the data center without any
water being used during the cooler months of the year. During the hottest months of
the year, outside air was cooled through an evaporative process using water, before
the air was allowed into the server rooms. The cooling systems were optimized to use
minimal water and they utilized real-time sensor data to adapt to the changing weather
conditions.
AWS strove to use non drinking water to cool the servers to save on drinking
water. In Northern Virginia, AWS was the first cloud data center operator to be
approved to use recycled water with direct evaporative cooling technology. It sought
to implement onsite modular water treatment systems55 in multiple regions. That
was needed as the continuous cycling of water through evaporative cooling units
led to the build up of minerals as the water evaporated, which eventually reached a
level of concentration that required replacement with fresh water. Onsite water
treatment allowed AWS to remove minerals and reuse the water for more process
cycles.
Criticism of AWS's Green Computing Efforts
Despite its best efforts, Amazon was subjected to criticism from various quarters. In
October 2017, a report by Greenpeace evaluated different IT companies on the basis
of ren ewable-energy sources; tran sparency; renewa ble-energy commitment and
policies; energy efficiency and greenhouse-gas mitigation, and renewable-energy
procurement. The group gave public cloud leader AWS an overall 'C' grade, putting
it behind infrastructure rivals Google (which earned an 'A') and Microsoft ('B')56
(see Exhibit VIII).
The report also said, "One of the single biggest obstacles to sector transparency
is Amazon Web Services (AWS). The ''s biggest cloud computer company remains
almost completely non -transparent about the energy foo tprint o f its massive
operations. Among the global cloud providers, only AWS still refuses to make public
basic details on the energy performance and environmental impact associated with
its operations."57
In February 2019, another report by Greenpeace accused Amazon of abandoning
its commitment to 100% renewable energy. As the report noted, some of its largest
data centers were powered by only 12% renewable energy.
In Virginia, which supported the core of Amazon's cloud infrastructure, the report
stated that AWS had increased its operations by 59% in the previous two years without
adding any new renewable energy.58 Elizabeth Jardim, Greenpeace USA Senior
Corporate Campaigner, said, "Despite Amazon's public commitment to renewable
energy, the ''s largest cloud computing company is hoping no one will notice that
it's still powering its corner of the internet with dirty energy. Unless Amazon and other cloud giants in Virginia change course, our growing use of the internet could
lead to more pipelines, more pollution and more problems for our climate."59
Of the data center operators included in the Greenpeace analysis, Facebook had
achieved 37% renewable energy in Virginia, Microsoft 34%, while Google and Digital
Realty Trust Inc.60 were operating with 4% renewable energy. Apple and Salesforce did
not own data centers in Virginia, but had offset 100% and 44% of their co-location
leases61 with renewables, respectively.62 Greenpeace explained that although AWS had
purchased a sizeable amount of renewable energy locally in 2015-2016, this was dwarfed
by the additional energy supply needed for new projects in the area.
In response to the report, an AWS spokesperson said, "Greenpeace has chosen to
report inaccurate data about the energy consumption and renewable mix of AWS's
infrastructure and did not perform proper due-diligence by fact checking with AWS
before publishing. Greenpeace's estimates overstate both AWS's current and projected
energy usage. Additionally, the report does not properly highlight that AWS has been
a major investor in solar projects across the Commonwealth of Virginia and played a
leading role in making it easier for us and other companies to bring more renewable
energy to Virginia through our Market-Based Rate with Dominion Virginia Power."63
However, a number of major internet companies had begun taking action to improve
green computing measures in their cloud systems (see Exhibit IX). Greenpeace pointed
to Apple as an industry leader, as the company had committed to powering its iCloud64
exclusively through renewable energy. It had backed that up by constructing the US's
largest privately-owned solar farms at its North Carolina data centers and by powering
its new Nevada data centers with geothermal65 and solar energy. Apple had also
purchased wind energy for its Oregon and California data centers.
The Road Ahead
Amazon launched a website called https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/ to track
progress and report on its sustainability commitments, initiatives, and performance.
The site included information on Amazon's carbon footprint and other sustainability
metrics that shared the progress of the company. The website claimed, "Our results
show that AWS's infrastructure is 3.6 times more energy-efficient than the median of
the surveyed US enterprise data centers. More than two-thirds of this advantage is
attributable to the combination of a more energy- efficient server population and much
higher server utilization. When we factor in the carbon intensity of consumed electricity
and renewable energy purchases, which reduce associated carbon emissions, AWS
performs the same task with an 88% lower carbon footprint."66
In April 2019, more than 4,500 Amazon employees through an open letter urged
the company to take aggressive action on climate change and reduce its carbon
footprint. The employees requested the management to stop offering custom cloudcomputing
services that supported the oil and gas industry in extracting more fossil
fuels. They also said Amazon had failed to disclose a companywide plan to reach zero
carbon emissions within the timeline required by science, and that its 100% renewable
energy goal had no deadline.67
An Amazon spokesperson did not comment on the employees' letter but told business
news channel CNBC that the company was taking several steps to address climate
change. In a blog post, Dave Clark, Senior Vice-President of 'wide Operations,
Amazon, added, "Earlier this year, we announced that we will share our companywide
carbon footprint, along with related goals and programs. We also announced Shipment
Zero, our vision to make all Amazon shipments net zero carbon, with 50% of all
shipments net zero by 2030."68 However, analysts pointed out that Amazon had not
actually disclosed how it planned to achieve net zero status or report the exact amount
of its carbon emissions beyond its blog post.
On February 17, 2020, Bezos announced that he was committing $10 bn to address
the climate crisis in a new initiative called the Bezos Earth Fund. The effort was supposed to fund scientists, activists, and nongovernmental organizations. Bezos,
who had been pushed by Amazon employees on climate issues, said he expected to
start issuing grants in 2020 summer. He said, "Climate change is the biggest threat to
our planet. I want to work alongside others both to amplify known ways and to explore
new ways of fighting the devastating impact of climate change on this planet we all
share."69
The workers at Amazon, through their group "Amazon Employees for Climate
Justice", stated that although they commended Bezos's philanthropy, they felt that
one hand cannot give what the other is taking away. They added, "The people of
Earth need to know: When is Amazon going to stop helping oil and gas companies
ravage Earth with still more oil and gas wells? When is Amazon going to stop funding
climate-denying think tanks like the Competitive Enterprise Institute and climatedelaying
policy?"70
Suggested Readin gs an d References