As India moves closer to the In-
ternational Financial Report-
ing Standards (IFRS) convergence date, i.e., April 1, 2011, the
debate on `Why IFRS?' has quickly shifted to `How?' If there is one industry
that IFRS will have maximum impact on, it will have to be the banking
industry. Banks will not only have to grapple with technical accounting issues, but
also the other challenges that come along with it, such as the changes that
would be required to the IT systems, the management of capital adequacy, the
impact on treasury, performance management, and much more.
As a result of the global credit crisis and responding to the G20's
requirement, the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) is rewriting
the financial instrument standards. Various parts of the standard are being
considered under different projects, such as Classification and Measurement,
Fair Value Measurement, Derecognition, Hedging and Impairment. IASB has
already issued the Exposure Draft (ED) on `Classification and Measurement',
and the final standard would be available before the close of the year.
However, hedging and impairment final standards would be issued only in 2010.
All this brings additional uncertainty and challenges to Indian banks. The April
1, 2011 date actually translates to April 1, 2010 because of the requirement
under IFRS to produce IFRS compliant comparable numbers. This would
leave banks with very little time to convert under the new standards, and
hence there would be a greater need for Indian banks to keep themselves
well-prepared and ready to implement the changes swiftly. More importantly,
Indian banks have to be mindful not to carry over concepts or practices from
Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). If IFRS, as issued
by IASB, is to constitute a single set of globally accepted accounting standards,
it is vitally important not to promote separate national versions of
IFRS. Therefore, this would require a mindset change by Indian banks.
Financial statements of banks will be significantly impacted by the
conversion, though the extent and whether the impact would be positive or
negative would depend on a number of interrelated factors. Also, a negative impact
on opening equity may have a positive impact on subsequent P&L.
|