Diversification involves transformation of a mono-cropped farm into a multifaceted
farm enterprise. It is among the most important strategies available to the farmer for stabilizing
the income, and spreading out the risk of production (Murty, 1998). In Himachal
Pradesh, agricultural diversification is of complex nature due to variation in agro-climatic
conditions between different regions. Diversification has taken place at all levels, but it appears to
have benefited more the districts falling in mid and high hills and also the medium and
large farmers (Chand et al., 1986). Diversification is also considered as an important means for
rapid economic growth in tribal areas. It can generate more employment opportunities and
provide regular income to the farmers in these areas. In Himachal Pradesh, 84.5% of the total
holdings belong to small and marginal farmers, operating only 47.1% of cultivable land
(Economic Survey 2004-05). These farmers cultivate mainly low value and subsistence crops. In
the absence of adequate farm and non-farm employment opportunities, they are also forced to
live in poverty. The situation is likely to be worsen because of growing pressure of
population on land and the limited scope of increasing production through subsistence farming.
Hence, the need for commercialization and diversification of small farms within and
outside agriculture and their proper integration with local and global markets is obvious. This
is intended not only to liberate the marginal and small farmers from the poverty trap, but
also to meet the state's growing demands for fruits, vegetables, milk and milk products, meat,
fish, eggs, etc., which generally show increasing trend with rising levels of per capita income
in the economy (Haque, 1996).
The state has been divided into two parts, viz., tribal and non-tribal areas. The
multistage stratified random cum purposive sampling technique has been used in the present study.
One Tehsil each from tribal and non-tribal areas has been selected, from which two revenue
villages have been randomly selected, and finally, a sample of 30 marginal and small farmers from
each village have been taken in probability proportion to their actual number. Thus, the study
is based on 120 marginal and small farmers located in the tribal and non-tribal areas of the
state. The farmers have been classified into two different categories, i.e., marginal and small
farmers, based on the standard classification, according to which the farmers owning less than 1
ha of land are termed as marginal farmers and the farmers having 1-2 ha of land are termed
as small farmers. |