|
The study aims to outline the causes that led to the victory
and the subsequent influence of Soviet communism over the
Central and Eastern European countries after the World War
II, the way the economies of those countries developed,
and the respective revolutions against the system as such.
With these coordinates established, the largest part of
the efforts made by the author is dedicated to the transition
of the economies in Central and Eastern Europe from the
strictly centralized and bureaucratized socialist model
to the open market one. The stages of the transition are
examined, and the shortcomings are pointed out. The paper
concludes saying that these changes will lead to their logical
fruition under the aegis of the European Union.
The end of the Second World War marked a great victory
of democracy over a violent, fierce and bloody dictatorship
- the Nazi Germany. The end of the great conflagration also
marked a particular concession made by two Western victorious
powers, the Great Britain and the United States, to a great
Eastern power but an an acute and primitive dictatorship
- the USSR. This terrible concession consisted, in fact,
of absolute control credited to the USSR over the Central
and East European Countries such as Poland, Czechoslovakia,
Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Albania, and Yugoslavia - a
control which represented, theoretically and practically,
the evolution of these countries on the model of the Soviet
colossus. Iosif Visarionovici Stalin, the generalissimo
of Kremlin, obtained an even greater victory than the diplomatic
one obtained after the war.
According to some recent historical perspectives, we must
take into account both the quality and the health of the
leaders of the three important countries involved in negotiations
then. On one part of the stage, there was Winston Churchill,
Great Britain's prime minister - a remarkable statesman,
very experienced and determined in the crucial moments of
some dramatic evolutions, wise and appreciated all over
the world. Although he was almost 70 years old (his negotiations
with Stalin started around the year 1934, or even before),
yet he was a "charming" man, a heavy whiskey drinker
- according to some testimonies, he was in the habit of
drinking a bottle and a half every day. He was not in a
very good state of health, which, combined with his propensity
for strong alcohol and his advanced age, accounted for a
"negative result". On the same part of the stage,
there was also a great president of the United States, the
father of the 1934 New Deal, Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
who was the elected president for the third mandate in an
exceptional way, for reasons that are related to war. But
by then, he was in a wheelchair and had been suffering for
years from hemiphlegy, far from good physical health - some
doctors doubted his mental health toototally exhausted,
which perhaps prevented him from negotiating on normal,
strictly realistic grounds.
|
