The Initial Public Offering (IPO) market in India has recently attracted the attention of
the media for scams in the allotment of shares. The charges are that a few individuals got a
large number of shares allocated in IPOs of various companies under fictitious names. The role
of the banks as well as Depository Participants (DPs) has therefore, come under scanner.
The market regulatorSecurities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has already passed
an order asking the DPs for payment of a disgorgement amount of Rs. 1160 mn
(approximately US$28.3 mn).The recent scam in the allotment of shares in IPOs raises an
interesting questionWhat makes the investors rush towards IPOs? It seems that there is a
significant difference in the prices at which the IPOs are offered to the investors and the price at
which they trade on the day of the listing. So, if the investors get shares allotted in an IPO at a
lower offer price and then sell them on the first day of listing at higher prices, then they can
make substantial gains. This phenomenon is known as `Underpricing' in the IPO market. In
other words, the market (on the day of the listing) seems to believe that the offer price of the
stock was lower and deserves a higher price. The higher the underpricing, the greater is the
amount of money that can be made by investors who got allocations in the IPO and sell these on
the day of listing. This phenomenon is also referred to as `money left on the table' by the firms.
Studying the IPOs in the Indian markets is important for another reason. India has
become the first country in the world to introduce a rating mechanism for the IPOs prior to
their listing. While rating of debt instruments is fairly common, equity ratings is a unique
concept. Ostensibly, the aim of this exercise, started at the behest of the market regulator in
India, SEBI, is to make the investors more informed about the fundamentals of the firms in
which they are investing their money. It is also likely to have an impact on the huge
oversubscriptions that most of the IPO issues in India generate. However, according to SEBI, this rating is
not about the `quality or valuation' of the public issue. Presumably then, the rating agencies
are going to evaluate the firm with respect to the disclosures made in the prospectus. So in
effect, the rating agencies would be reducing thick documents of the firms' prospectus to a
simple letter-based rating for the investors. This rating (although SEBI claims would not be
about the valuation of the issue) is likely to serve as a signal to a retail investor about the
credibility of the firm. The efficacy of this regulation will be tested in the times to come. There could
be a difference in assessment of the firms' fundamentals, as disclosed in its prospectus,
between the rating agencies and the informed institutional investors.
Risk in Investment in IPOs for Retail Uninformed Investors. |