India has a long coastline of 811,800 sq.km having considerable potential for
the development of fisheries.Fisheries in the
east coast of India, comprising Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh,
Orissa and West Bengal, are dominated by shrimp culture. Shrimp has become
a major export item for India for a decade now with a large share in the total exports.
The total shrimp export from India has gradually increased
with a growth rate of 0.18% in 1978-79 to 17% in 1990-91. The peak period of export growth of shrimp was
from
1990-91 to 1995-96. Subsequently, shrimp export started declining
until 1998-99 following the frequent disease outbreaks in the major
shrimp-producing states. In recent times, it has again started reviving with a growth rate of 14% in 2002-2003.
But, the share of cultured shrimp in the total shrimp export has been increasing steadily during the period
1988-89 to 2002-2003. During this period, the share of cultured shrimp has become almost
double both in terms of quantity and value.
The different culture systems existent in shrimp culture farming can be
conventionally classified into four categoriestraditional, extensive, semi-intensive and intensivebased
on the increasing inputs of feeding and water management as well as stocking density. But
there can be country-specific deviations from these practices. In India there are five kinds
of systems, namely traditional, improved
traditional, extensive,
semi-intensive and intensive.
The shrimp culture systems in India is an age-old practice which occupies 36.23%
of the total cultivated brackish water area, of which 27.18% area is in West Bengal
and 7.03% is in Kerala. The production was low prior to the 1990s when the
traditional practice was the dominating one. The real turning point of production of cultured
shrimp was the advent of scientific farming as a part of the Asian Development Bank (ADB)
and World Bank project in 1988-89. Though various incentives to promote this
farming system have helped shoot up the production levels, they can have
detrimental environmental consequences (Primavera, 1991; Pillay, 1992; and World
Bank, 2000). |