Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Organizational Behaviour :
Justice-Turnover Relationship: Commitment as a Mediator
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper seeks to investigate which component of organizational justice, i.e., distributive or procedural, is most central to the prediction of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. It examines the mediating role of organizational commitment in the relationship between organizational justice and turnover intentions. The study reports responses of 198 middle level managers from two organizations located in Quetta, Pakistan. Data were collected by using standardized scales of distributive justice, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions. After establishing the psychometric properties of the scales, hypotheses were tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Proposed mediation hypothesis were tested using Preacher and Hayes (2008) recommendations. Results indicate that (1) procedural justice is more likely to predict organizational commitment; (2) distributive justice and organizational commitment directly influence turnover intentions; (3) organizational commitment mediates the relationship of procedural justice with turnover intentions; and (4) distributive justice directly influences procedural justice.

In the past two decades, there has been increase in the field of research concerning the importance of organizational justice perceptions within organizational setting. Underlying this research interest is the view that employees are not indifferent to justice, but they value it (believe to be important) and they react cognitively and behaviorally to it. Although there is accumulating evidence that justice perceptions influence various work attitudes, behaviors and outcomes (e.g., Cropanzano and Greenberg, 1997; Lee, 2000 Ambrose, 2002; Aryee et al., 2002; Hassan and Chandaran, 2005; Bhal and Ansari, 2007; and Lambert et al., 2007), but still there is a need for rigorous research to underpin various unknown relationships between organizational justice perceptions and organizational variables such as organizational commitment and turnover intentions. For example, the differential impact of organizational justice perceptions on organizational commitment and turnover intentions, as well as the process through which these justice perceptions impact turnover intentions are such profound research questions which need to be empirically tested.

Organizational justice refers to the perceptions of organizational members regarding the fairness of their conditions of employment (Folger and Cropanzano, 1998). According to Greenberg (1990), organizational justice includes perceived fairness of decision outcomes and resource allocations (i.e., distributive justice) and perceived fairness of the processes by which decisions are made (i.e., procedural justice). Researchers have conceptualized these two constructs as perceptions (i.e., perceived fairness).

 
 
 

Justice-Turnover Relationship, Commitment as a Mediator, organizational justice, distributive justice, procedural justice, work-attitude, turnover intentions, antecedents, productivity, hiring, training, Consistency, Bias-Suppression, Accuracy, Correctability, Representativeness, Ethicality.