Over the last two decades, a great deal of attention has been given to the role of institutions 
                      in economic growth. Good institutions embody a heritage of past good policy decisions and 
                      themselves generate a flow of superior policy decisions that support sustained investment and 
                      production growth (Rodrik et al., 2002). It has been argued that to ensure sustained growth and 
                      convergence with the living standards of advanced countries, the acquisition of high quality institutions 
                      is the prerequisite. These arguments apply with extra force to infrastructure 
                      industries, i.e., the utility service industries. An effective institutional framework is essential to sustain growth in 
                      output, efficiency and capacity of the utility service sector such as electricity, 
                      telecommunications and water. The standard solution is to introduce an independent regulatory agency, within a 
                      clearly defined legal framework. The regulatory agency 
                      would engender sustained growth in capacity and efficiency in utility service industries.  
                In the last 20 years, the power sector has been subject to restructuring. Despite the 
                  challenges of high capital costs, political interference, network monopoly effects, daunting regulatory 
                  tasks, reformers have found ways to introduce market forces. In the early 1980s, new ideas have 
                  been advanced and economists have recognized that some aspects of electric power systems are 
                  not natural monopolies and could be made more efficient through market competition (Joskow 
                  and Schmalensee, 1983).   |