|
The IUP Journal of Structural Engineering
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Description |
 |
Many medium-rise apartment buildings are being constructed in India using
shear walls to provide resistance to earthquake. These shear walls may have openings
for the windows, doors and duct spaces for functional reasons. The number,
location and size of the openings affect the behavior of a structure.
Framed structures with shear walls are frequently adopted as the structural
system for high-rise buildings. This structural system would also have many openings
for the entrance to elevator or staircases, etc. Generally, plane stress elements and
beam elements are used to model the shear wall and frames respectively in the analysis
of this kind of building using STAAD.Pro 2004, but one can use surface element
to model shear wall using STAAD.Pro 2006. The openings may be of large size in
the case of function halls, conference halls and movie theaters. The number,
location, size and shape of the openings affect the behavior of the structure in the form
of deflection and stresses in the members. These openings seriously affect
the performance of the building.
Several researchers have studied the behavior of shear walls with
openings experimentally and analytically. Kent (1974) proposed a method for the analysis
of coupled walls with door openings near the edge of the wall. The method was
based on continuous connection technique. Khan and Stafford (1976) developed a
simplified method by idealizing the basic structure as an assemblage of analogous
plate modulus whose stiffness properties are evaluated from finite element analysis. The
idealized structure of an unperforated cantilever wall with equivalent stiffness was
analyzed by hand, using engineer's beam theory. The method was found to be suitable for
wall-frame structure with height to width ratio greater than two and having
more than two vertical bands of openings. Daniel et al. (1986) have tested two one-third scale wall specimens under severe earthquake loads to study the effect of
centrally located openings at each floor level. Kobayanshi et al. (1995) have tested 26 wall specimens to study the effect of small openings on the strength and stiffness
of shear walls in reactor buildings. Based on the test results, they proposed the
method for predicting the shear strength of walls. Johnson (1997) tested different
wall configurations containing various openings and one control wall with no
openings to determine the ultimate capacity and stiffness of shear walls. Qamaruddin
(1998) proposed an approximate method to determine in-plane stiffness of shear
walls with openings, in which spandrels are assumed flexible and can translate and
rotate under lateral load. The computed in-plane stiffness compares well with the
stiffness computed by the elastic finite element method. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Keywords |
 |
Structural Engineering Journal, Shear Walls, Framed Structures, Elastic Finite Element Method, Continuous Connection Techniques, Beam Elements, Plane Stress Elements, Structural Elements, Matrix Condensation Techniques, Medium-rise Apartment Buildings, Functional Requirements. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|