Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
Effective Executive Magazine:
Leadership's `Toxic Tandem' Growing Angst in Downturn
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The need for a boss to be good, particularly during periods of stress, is self-evident. But it is not that easy, for the mechanics of leadership becomes more dynamic when human beings with their known foibles, quirks, and blind spots interact. Hence, the need to be aware of, and overcome the `toxic tandem' of leadership.

 
 
 

Leadership is an enigma. In times of downturn—when fear engulfs the corporate corridors, confidence erodes, and the road ahead looks rough for miles together—it becomes more inscrutable. Indeed, Robert I Sutton, Professor of Management Science and Engineering at Stanford University, categorically states that it is not easy to be a good leader even in good times. And the reason is: the "dynamic that naturally arises in relationships of unequal power". He says, "people who gain authority over others tend to become more self-centered and less mindful of what others need, do, and say". On the other hand, followers would scrutinize the leader's "self-absorbed words and deeds" closely. Together, these two tendencies constitute the `toxic tandem' of leadership that merits the attention of every leader to successfully overcome it.

To prove the point that leaders tend to be generally oblivious to their followers' perspectives, Robert Sutton cites the results of the "cookie experiment" of the psychologists Dacher Keltner, Deborah H Gruenfeld, and Cameron Anderson, carried out in 2003. Under this experiment, the psychologists instructed teams of three students each to produce a short policy paper. Two members of each team were randomly assigned with the task of writing the paper, while the other member was asked to evaluate the policy paper and determine how much the other two must be paid. In effect, this arrangement made the evaluator a leader and the policy-drafters his subordinates. As the experiment went on for about 30 minutes, the experimenter kept a plate with five cookies before the team—a welcome break. Indeed, this is the crux of the experiment. As expected, all the three restrained from taking the last cookie from the plate—an expression of basic manners. But when it came to the fourth cookie—the extra one which could be taken with no negotiation or restrain, it was the leaders who took it—an expression of the little `taste of power'. "The `bosses' not only tended to take the fourth cookie, but also displayed the substantial effect of the `power' by their `disinhibited' style of eating —chewing with their mouths open, and scattering crumbs widely."

Robert Sutton avers that the experiment, thus, establishes the fact that when people—independent of personality— wield power, their ability to lord it over others makes them to: one, become more focused on their own needs and wants; two, become less focused on other's needs, wants, and actions; and three, act as if written and unwritten rules that others are expected to follow don't apply to them. According to Robert Sutton, leaders, besides becoming "self-centered", suffer from another myth: "They believe that they are aware of every important development in the organization (even when they are remarkably ignorant of key facts)". This affliction is labeled "the fallacy of centrality"—the assumption that as a leader holding a central position, one automatically knows everything that is necessary to exercise effective leadership. Interestingly, we come across these fallacies of a leader being portrayed by poet Valmiki vividly in his epic Ramayana, through the character of the great Ravana—a classic example of how greatness and goodness seldom coexist in one man.

 
 
 

Effective Executive Magazine, Toxic Tandem, Corporate Corridors, Baboon Troops, Evil Conducts, Cookie Experiment, Policy-Drafters, Evil Mission, Scattering Crumbs, Effective Leadership, Ascetic Lifes.