IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering:
A Comparative Study of 5-Bus and 14-Bus Systems with UPFC: A Power Flow Perspective
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Controlling power flow in modern power systems can be made more flexible using the recent developments in power electronics, and computing and control technology. The Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) is a Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) device that can control all the three system variables, namely, line reactance, magnitude and phase angle difference of voltage across the line. This leads to sufficient improvement in power transfer and reduction in power loss. The performance of UPFC depends on proper control setting achievable through a power flow analysis program. This paper presents a method to control the settings of UPFC (Feng and Nagan, 1999) through a modified Newton-Raphson-based load flow calculation. The proposed algorithm is developed to calculate the control setting of UPFC and the power flow between the lines after the load flow is converged. Case studies were performed on IEEE 5-bus and 14-bus systems to observe the effectiveness of the proposed method.

 
 
 

As the power systems are becoming more complex, there is a need for careful design of new devices for controlling the power flow in transmission systems, which should be flexible enough to adapt to any momentary system conditions. The operation of an AC power transmission line is generally constrained by limitations of one or more network parameters and operating variables. By using Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices such as Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM), Thyristor-Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC), Thyristor-Controlled Phase angle Regulator (TCPR) and Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC), the bus voltages, line impedances and phase angles in the power system can be regulated rapidly and flexibly.

UPFC consists of two switching converters, as shown in Figure 1. These converters are operated from a common DC link provided by a DC storage capacitor. Converter 2 provides the power flow control of UPFC by injecting an AC voltage Vpq with controllable magnitude and phase angle in series with the transmission line via a series transformer. Converter 1 is to absorb or supply the real power demand of converter 2 at the common DC link. It can also absorb or generate controllable reactive power and provide shunt reactive power compensation (Hingorani and Gyugyi, 2001).

The two voltage source model of UPFC is converted into two power injections in polar form for power flow studies with approximate impedances, as shown in Figure 2. The advantage of power injection representation is that it does not destroy the symmetric characteristics of admittance matrix. The voltage sources can be represented by the relationship between the voltages and amplitude modulation ratios and phase shift of the UPFC. In this model, the shunt transformer impedance, the transmission line impedance and the series transformer impedance are assumed to be constant and no power loss is considered with the UPFC.

 
 
 

Electrical and Electronics Engineering Journal, 5-Bus, 14-Bus Systems, Flexible AC Transmission System, Modern Power Systems, Unified Power Flow Controller, Transmission Systems, UPFC Control Parameters, Transmission Line, Jacobian Matrix, UPFC Modeling, Graphical Representations.