These lines from Thoreau's Walden (1982, p. 88) very succinctly
represent the symbolic paradigm of a quest for self-fulfillment in an elemental life,
as opposed to the artificiality of an urban cultural life. Emerson's Nature was the first definitive statement of this philosophical perspective. It was a
definitive statement on individualism and a new optimism that linked God, Nature,
and Man into a magnificent cosmos. The ideas which Emerson had endorsed
in Nature found explicit moral and practical application in Thoreau's Walden:
Or, Life in the Woods. These classics of American nature writing came as
a balm to a society on the throes of societal upheavals. Nineteenth
century America was a society in a state of flux, concerned as it was with the notion
of nation-building. As industrialism gathered speed, it squeezed out
the consciousness of all, and the new society's dynamism filled many with dread.
These words register Emerson's protest against the existing
conceptual framework of perceiving nature. What Emerson envisions in the above
words is a communion with nature through personal experience. The emergence
of modern science in the West in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries led
to the belief that nature was meant to be subordinated by man. This
`conceptual framework' consists in the belief that, as asserted by Francis Bacon,
"Nature must be `bound into service' and made a `slave,' `put in constraint,' and
`molded' by the mechanical arts" (Merchant, 1992, p. 46). This emphasis, based on
the paradigm of dominance, has led to an imbalance in our values and
attitudes, which lies at the very root of our current ecological crisis. This crisis, in
turn, led to the development of Ecocriticism as an academic discipline in the
1990s. The development of eco-writing in the twentieth century, however, owes
its genesis, to a large extent, to the British Romantic writers of the early
nineteenth century and the American Transcendentalists. |