Facility location selection is a vital element in the decision-making process for a
wide range of manufacturing organizations due to high initial investment. The facility
location selection is based on many operational, strategic and logistic decisions. It is
very difficult to relocate the available facilities once the location is established. The
problem of facility location selection arises at the time of setting new manufacturing facility
or changes in the existing facility due to changes in production capacities, addition
or deletion of product lines or changes in market demands. The better the location,
the more is its return on investment with higher profit and productivity. The best
facility location decision can result in significant productivity improvement with lower
operating costs and higher delivery performance. Selection of the facility locations for
the manufacturing organizations largely depends on many criteria, which have
either direct or indirect impact on the production operation. Hence, selection of the
most appropriate facility location is a complex decision-making task requiring an
extensive evaluation of the influencing criteria. Some of these criteria include availability of
the raw material sources and proximity of markets, availability of labor and
trained manpower, environmental and political climate, government policies and
taxes, ancillary industries and other resources of production. Thus, the objective of the
facility location decision is to select the location of a facility such that the maximum
possible advantages can be achieved while considering multiple conflicting criteria. As
the selection procedure involves several alternative facility locations and selection
criteria, it is often necessary to compromise among those conflicting criteria. For these
reasons, different Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods are observed to be
quite effective for solving the facility location selection problems. This paper explores
the application of the UTility Additive (UTA) method for solving the facility location
selection problems while taking into account both the qualitative as well as quantitative
criteria. Two real time examples are illustrated to demonstrate and validate the
applicability and potentiality of the UTA method. It is observed that the results obtained using
this method are almost similar those derived by the past researchers.
Past researchers have already applied different techniques to solve the facility
location selection problems. But most of those techniques use complex
mathematical formulations, while ignoring qualitative information about the considered
criteria. Randhawa and West (1995) proposed a solution approach to facility location
selection problems while integrating analytical and MCDM models. Houshyar and White
(1997) developed a mathematical model and heuristics approach that would assign
`N' machines to `N' equal-sized locations on a given site such that the total
adjacency flow between the machines would be maximized. Owen and Daskin (1998)
provided an overview of the methodologies that had been developed for solving the
facility location selection problems. Chu (2002) presented a fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique
for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method-based approach for
solving the plant location selection problems. |