|
In the economic literature, three different approaches are described to portray the
effects of fiscal corrections. The first is the traditional Keynesian theory, according to
which fiscal expansion will increase the product in the short term. The second is the
neoclassical theory according to which fiscal corrections do not influence the
product, and that is determined mainly by the aggregate supply. The third approach,
which attacks the Keynesians for neglecting the role of expectations, is an outcome of a
number of significant fiscal corrections which occurred in Europe during the 1980s and
1990s and created unique non-Keynesian effects.
The first event occurred during 1983-1986 in Denmark, which made
significant cutbacks in the budget deficit by raising taxes and decreasing the
government investment. The second event occurred during 1987-1989 in Ireland, which also made
a significant cutback in the budget deficit by focusing on reduction of budgetary
spending, especially social welfare transfer payments and public-sector wage payments. In
both events, a surprising increase occurred in economic activity and product (mainly
an increase in private consumption and also in private investment). This is contrary
to what is expected according to the Keynesian theory. The third event occurred in
Sweden during 1991-1992 in which fiscal expansion led surprisingly to a sharp decrease
in economic activity and product. In parallel, the dramatic fiscal expansion in Japan
both by means of increase of government investment and decrease in taxes during the
last decade, which did not contribute to an increase of economic activity, must be noted. |