In this simulation, several Multiuser Detectors (MUD) are compared with
the conventional detector, the partial Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) detector,
and the full MMSE detector (Wang and Poor, 1998). While the partial MMSE detector
can reduce only intra-cell interference, the full MMSE detector can reduce both
intra-cell interference and inter-cell interference with the assumption that all
spreading codes such as M-sequence or Gold-sequence of both known and unknown users
are known. The performances of the blind MMSE MUD were evaluated. For
both synchronous systems and asynchronous systems, the blind MMSE MUD using
the subspace method outperforms the blind MMSE MUD using the direct method
because it gains high resolution from the subspace decomposition. After some symbols,
the Signal to Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR) of the blind MMSE detector using
the subspace method crosses over the partial MMSE detector and converges to the
full MMSE detector. In the case of random code, it crosses over the partial MMSE
detector and the conventional detector faster than in the case of gold code because the
partial MMSE detector and the conventional detector have worse performance in the
case of random code (Shimon, 1996; and Wang and Poor, 1998 and 2004).
Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) relies on the use of spread
spectrum techniques to achieve multiple communication channels. With CDMA (Proakis
and Salehi, 2002; Tranter et al., 2004; and Wang and Poor, 2004) each user's narrow
band signal is modulated by a high rate special code (pseudo-random binary
sequence). This causes the spreading of the bandwidth of the user's signal resulting in
a wideband signal. A large number of CDMA users share the same frequency
spectrum. If CDMA is viewed either in time or frequency domain, the signals appear to
be overlapping; they are separated by their special code. In the receivers, the signals
are correlated by the appropriate pseudo-random code which de-spreads the
spectrum. The other users' signals whose codes do not match are not despread and
therefore only appear as noise and represent a self-interference generated by the system.
The Signal-to-Interference Ratio (SIR) for CDMA is determined by the ratio of
the desired signal power to the total interference power from all the other users.
The capacity of CDMA is therefore only limited by the amount of interference
that can be tolerated from other users. This is why the capacity of CDMA is said to
be interference limited (unlike Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) and
Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) capacities which are primarily bandwidth
limited) (Proakis and Salehi, 2002; Tranter et
al., 2004; and Wang and Poor, 2004). |