|
The IUP Journal of Infrastructure :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Description |
 |
|
The
mobile telephony and internet technology have structurally
changed in the last two decades. As a result, the mobile
communication became the premium service offering voice
transmission with mobility, which is more common. The regulatory
policy changes took place from natural monopoly to free
market. As a result, telecommunication technology and the
structure of demand of telecommunication services rapidly
increased. Now telecommunication policy is making itself
efficient for a multiplicity of operators to supply these
services to business and consumers. For the last 20 years,
mobile telephony and internet technology have dramatically
changed the telecommunications sector. Mobile communications
started as a premium service offering voice transmission
with mobility. As the service became more common, mobile
telephony challenged the notion of natural monopoly within
the sector and unraveled a wave of regulatory change that
had deeply changed the market structure of telecom industry.
Institutional and regulatory reform was generally spurred
by the rapid evolution of both telecommunications technology
and the structure of demand for telecommunications services,
which has eliminated virtually all natural monopoly conditions,
making it possible and efficient for a multiplicity of operators
to supply these services to businesses and consumers. In
turn, the new market and regulatory environment is having
a substantial impact on the structure and organization of
the industry. Technological advances in recent years made
available mobile telecommunications services at an unprecedented
scale. Technical progress is generally presumed to have
brought about improvement in the revenue, range, quality
and prices of telecom services as observed in many developing
countries. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Keywords |
 |
|
Telecom Market Structure, Rregulatory reforms, Econometric model, Rapid evolution, Telecommunications technology, Mobile telecommunications, Indian domestic market, Non-pricing competition strategies, Natural monopoly, Regulatory environment, Telecommunications services. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|