Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Amicus Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Soft Skills :
Humor Quotient in Soft Skills Training
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Soft skills trainers adopt the most sophisticated training tools and instruments. These instruments are well known to the trainers, but less known to the trainees before their implementation. Mental and psychological correlation of the trainers and the trainees is important.Trainees may not appreciate complicated instruments or tools of training. Today, the trainees look at two important aspects: (1) The information that is obtained easily; and (2) The type of trainer—whether they like him or not? If the trainees have an affinity for the trainer, then training becomes a rich experience, otherwise it becomes stressful. Humor is one way to align oneself with the trainees and develop a rapport. This paper throws light on the preferences of the trainees in the field of soft skills.

 
 
 

Organizational learning occurs at various levels. At an individual level, people in the organization are called upon to transfer the knowledge learnt in one setting to a new situation and to another similar situation. Soft skills trainers are basically outside the organization and transmit information to people inside the organization. This knowledge is not considered to be core domain knowledge, but is required to augment the learning process. Davenport and Prusak (1998) report that Knowledge Management (KM) encompasses a broad range of tools, technologies and managerial practices intended to produce bottom line benefits by making better use of an organization’s intellectual capital.

Since knowledge creation, acquisition, retention and transfer are important in the growth of an industry, this research work aims at investigating the influence of humor in the process of training people in soft skills.Most companies commence KM activities by focusing on creating, identifying, collecting, consolidating, interpreting and sharing the best practices or learnings that need an organization wide understanding. Organizational knowledge is available at both physical and intellectual levels. Ganesh Sherman (2002) says that what is known or can be found out is explicit knowledge and what is stored in the minds of the people is tacit knowledge. Explicit knowledge may be expressed in words or numbers, but tacit knowledge is not visible and is inexpressible. Literatures of Cohen and Sproul (1996), Szulanski (1996) and Zander and Kogut (1995) highlight that organizational learning and learning literatures often focus on a type of knowledge transfer, which implies that, the method of transfer is not focused. Wernerfelt (1984) and Grant (1996), report that organizations that can make full use of their collective expertise and knowledge are more likely to be innovative, effective and efficient in their market place. Granovetter (1973), advocates that relationships are important for acquisition of information. A study by Borgatti and Cross (2003) shows that at least three enduring relational characteristics are predictive of information seeking behavior—(1) knowing what the other person knows; (2) valuing what the other person knows in relation to one’s work; and (3) being able to get timely access to that person’s thinking.

 
 
 

Humor Quotient, Soft Skills Training, Mental and psychological correlation, Core domain knowledge, Knowledge Management, Intellectual capital technologies, Managerial practices, Organizational learning, Organizational knowledge, Decision making process, Human Resource Development, HRD.