Well before the commencement of the Seoul meet, the 
                          governments of China, Germany, Brazil, and 
                          Russia, along with the Republicans of America, started screaming 
                          at the US policy of `quantitative easing' (QE2). It all started with  
                          the Fed announcing its intention to purchase another $600 
                          bn of long-term Treasury securities essentially "to promote 
                          a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure 
                          that inflation [which is reported to be running at the lowest 
                          level ever recorded of just 0.6%], over time, is at levels 
                          consistent with its mandate," so that bond yields will be down and 
                          employment gets maximized.  
                    And these countriesparticularly, China and 
                      Germany which are known to maintain huge trade 
                      surplusespounded the US with redoubled energy at the Summit too, indeed 
                      as never before. No one is willing to buy the argument that 
                      since the short-term interest rates in the US are already near 
                      zero, the Fed, which like any other Central Bank being engaged in stimulating its 
                      economy, has no alternative but to create new bank reserves to purchase medium- and 
                      long-term securities. It is simply a `monetary policy'! 
                     Yet, no one is ready to agree, for they consider it as `inflationary' and a means to 
                          currency manipulation. Which is why they argue that the current move of the Fed is certain 
                          to lower the international value of dollar and raise the world commodity prices, leading 
                          to a fall in the profit margins of businesses, obviously, of the export-oriented economies. 
                          To a certain extent, there is truth in the argument: after all, 
                          if certain countries are to run trade surpluses, there must 
                          be some with trade deficits. And all along, it is the US 
                          which happened to be the country with deficit. But the present 
                          move might, to a certain extent, weaken the US dollar, making 
                          the US goods more competitive globally, and lessen the US 
                          trade deficit; and that is what is disturbing these 
                          trade-surplus countries, for, after all, they need the US market for 
                  sustaining their export-led economies.                      |