The Social Network (2012) is defined as “a social formation comprising a subset of
actors and the interaction between these actors.” This theoretical formation is useful
to analyze interrelation between individuals, groups, organizations, or even the societies.
Researchers (Social Network Analysis, 2012) also studied how these social formation
influences other elements, how it changes relative density of ties, or how formation
changes over time (network dynamics).
In recent years, social network approach has become increasingly relevant in
computer information revolution (“The number of published applications has been
growing at about 250% per year over the past five years”—Wasserman and Faust,
1994a). With the proliferation of web technologies, there is an increasingly greater
amount of interaction by people while on the Internet. Web has enabled many ways of
interaction (White and Harary, 2001), which forms the social network structures
(Wellman, 2001). This phenomenon was fueled by the advent of Web 2.0 (Hendler
and Goldbeck, 2008). Social Networks have ushered in a multidimensional approach
to handle problems in social domains. It provides new angles of thought towards old
problems (Bearman et al., 1999). The Internet imposes new questions on the nature of
social networks and opens new perspectives for Social Network Analysis (SNA) (Nadel,
1957; Wasserman and Faust, 1994a; and http://www.semioticon.com/ semiotix/
semiotix14/sem-14-05.html). SNA is sophisticated academic field which combines
sociology, social psychology along with graph theory and statistics. A social network
operates on many levels, from personal friendship to across nations. It has a vital impact
on the way problems are being solved, corporations are being run, and individuals are
being motivated towards personal objectives.
|