IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Effect of Sample Size on X Chart for Correlated Data
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 

Shewhart X charts are often used in industries to detect the larger shifts in the process mean. One of the assumptions while implementing these charts is that the observations from the process output are Independent and Identically Distributed (IID), but in actual practice, the observations are correlated for many processes. This correlation has a significant effect on the performance of the Shewhart (standard) X chart. The performance of the X chart is studied for the IID and correlated data at different sample sizes. The Average Run Lengths (ARLs) at various sets of parameters of the X chart are computed by simulation, using MATLAB. Various optimal schemes of the X chart for different sample sizes and levels of correlation are suggested in this paper. The larger sample size (n) is recommended to detect the shift in the process mean quickly. The suggested schemes may be very useful at the shop floor level for industries and service sectors.

 
 

Control charts, one of the powerful tools of the Statistical Process Control (SPC) techniques, are widely used in industry for process improvement and for estimating parameters or monitoring the variability of a given process. Shewhart X charts are originally developed by Shewart (1931). The limits of the chart are known as Upper Control Limit (UCL) and Lower Control Limit (LCL). He suggested two control limits, i.e., UCL = X ? 3 n and LCL = X ? 3 n , where X is the target mean, ’ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size. The width of control limits is usually taken as 3.

The process is assumed to be out of control when the sample average falls beyond these limits. The Shewhart X chart is more useful to detect large shifts (> 2) in process mean. One of the assumptions of implementing the X chart is that the process outputs must be IID, but usually there is some correlation among the data. When this correlation builds up automatically in the entire process, this phenomenon is called autocorrelation. The observations from the process output are usually positively correlated in most of the cases. In this case, if the current observation is on one side of the mean, the next observation will most likely be found on the same side of the mean. Positively correlated data are characterized by runs above and below the mean. Positive correlation is more often encountered in practice than negative autocorrelation. The observations shown in Figure 1 are positively correlated.

 
 

Mechanical Engineering Journal, X charts, Average run length, Independent and identically distributed data, Autocorrelation, MATLAB.