The use of Financial Performance Measures (FPM) in managers’ compensation contracts
is largely documented in earnings management literature (Healy, 1985; DeAngelo, 1986;
and Gaver et al., 1995). Most related studies focus on the link between accounting figures
and earnings management behavior, whereas a few researchers used Non-Financial
Performance Measures (NFPM) in managers’ compensation contracts in order to check
earnings management patterns. The aim of this paper is to clarify if the existence of NFPM
in managers’ compensation contracts has a negative effect on opportunistic earnings
management behavior. Firm managers have always motivations for earnings management
in order to maximize firm value. Compensation contracts are always implicitly indexed
to firm performance. However, many factors can limit managers’ opportunistic behavior
such as corporate governance structures (Dechow et al., 2008), past earnings
management trends (Barton and Simko, 2002) and audit quality (Beker and Defond, 1998).
Our contribution consists in checking the impact of some NFPM on managers’ recourse
to opportunistic earnings management.
Studies on positive accounting theory can be classified into two main streams: earnings
management motivations which are largely developed (Healy, 1985; DeAngelo, 1986; Jones,
1991; Teoh et al., 1998; and Degeorges et al., 1999); and earnings’ management constraints
which are less developed. Our study is one of the fewer studies which address directly
the question of earnings management constraints (see also Barton and Simko, 2002). More
narrowly, we plan to answer the following question: Do NFPM in managers’ compensation
contracts constrain opportunistic earnings management behavior?
|