IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of English Studies :
Beyond Silence: Shashi Deshpande’s That Long Silence and Alternative Intercourse
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper examines how Shashi Deshpande’s That Long Silence generates a dialog regarding women’s speech to counter the silence that pervades the patriarchal culture which they inhabit. To achieve this goal, I have examined two ideologies—one grounded in patriarchy and the other grounded in female agency and dialog—to reveal the problems within the gender sphere. The assumption is that writing is a medium where writers can start creating spaces to speak and initiate opinions and dialog in the cultural sphere to help people reconsider society and the norms that determine their behaviors, worldviews, and roles within that society. But more important than literature’s function as a channel is the message that Deshpande shares with her readers, a message that she hopes will help the devoiced group come out of the spiral of silence created by the dominant speech.

 
 
 

Women’s lack of access to public speech, the resultant silence, and their attempts to reclaim voice have invited serious debates in recent critical discourse studies. The problematic categories of male speech and female silence have been traced to the unequal gender positions which turn men into active speakers while rendering women muted and passive listeners. Access to public speech is a privilege men have enjoyed in patriarchal cultures. For men, the transition from private to public speech does not pose much of a challenge, whereas women’s speech is either restricted by gendered speech systems, or, if permitted, characterized by its private nature. Social identification in patriarchal cultures is made linguistically, through speech. The words women speak situate them in their gender locations and class, thus precluding the possibility of expressing individual opinion. Women’s speech does not, therefore, enable them to either resist or challenge the ideological constraints superimposed by patriarchy. Such control of speech is a crucial part of the hegemony of dominant groups, which implies that the denial of access to public speech is one of the major forms of the oppression of women within a social class as well as in trans-class situations.

What constitutes this silence? What pre-empts women’s entry into the public sphere and the vocalization of their gendered experiences? In Johnson’s (1997, p. 5) words, “a society is patriarchal to the degree that it promotes male privilege by being male-dominated, male-identified, and male-centered.” Patriarchy, used as an apparatus, serves to embody the dominant values that influence various social structures including speech. Feminist activist hooks (1989, p. 211) examined how patriarchal culture influenced the gender sphere which is evident in the gender hierarchy in both public and private speech patterns; hooks further insists that patriarchal culture operates in social spheres through the apparatus of silence as women are conditioned against venturing into male-dominated public spheres and take upon themselves the roles that patriarchy determines for them. The silencing of women in patriarchal modes of discourse remains unchallenged and continues to dominate cultural spheres through the reaffirmation of ideologically-determined gender roles.

 
 
 

English Studies Journal, That Long Silence, Alternative Intercourse, problematic categories, unspeakability, spiral of silence.