Complexity’ has become a dominant feature in the lexicon of today’s supply chain
management field. Complexity no longer remains a novel stumbling block, as the supply
chain managers, irrespective of their sectors, are facing it increasingly. So understanding
the nature and source of the complexity has become very important for the managers, so
as to aptly find the means to manage and contain complexity. With the enhancement in
technology and sector competitiveness, complexity seems to be ever spiraling up across
sectors, and healthcare happens to be one of the foremost (Schneller and Smeltzer, 2006).
Christopher and Lee (2004) indicated the intensifying scenario and highlighted that
demand patterns across nearly every industrial and services sector is on the rise associated
with increasing volatility and vulnerability of supply chains due to various aspects,
including disturbances or disruptions, changing pattern of business models, adoption of
stringent practices, move towards prevalence of more outsourcing, trend towards reduced
supplier base, and last but most importantly, lacking in visibility and supply chain
confidence. Multiple interrelated firms and supply chain actors exhibiting inherent
complex interconnections are the characteristics of most buyer-supply networks across
industries (Choi and Hong, 2002). Hospital supply networks happen to be one of the most crowded and complex network types, with hundreds or even thousands of actors forming
the upstream and downstream network. Such networks often exhibit shift in strategies and
objectives within a dynamic environment which further complicates the scenario (Pathak
et al., 2007). Thus, in a Business to Business (B2B) scenario, with multiple upstream
suppliers and downstream customers, the role of the focal firm in managing the
complications and adapting to the network conditions becomes immensely important. It
can be rationally linked to buyer-supplier network decisions and optimization aspects
(Pathak et al., 2007).
|