Traditionally, Indian legislature has been taking guidance from foreign legislatures to
draft new bills. This is required when we are attempting to codify a subject matter
which is technical and dynamic like information technology. Taking such assistance
has many advantages—the technical jargon that we use would be identical with other
developed nations, facilitating common understanding and identity of approach that
in turn paves way for the unification of private laws. Secondly, we could visualize the
future and predict possible dangers which would not have been possible otherwise to
search for better remedies. This paper critically analyzes the Communications
Convergence Bill, 2001 (hereafter referred to as ‘the bill’), which has its roots in the
German Information and Communication Services Act, 1998, as well as in the British
White Paper proposals. In the process of critically analyzing the bill, the legal premises
of the bill are tested and amendment will be suggested which will suit the Indian
Conditions of Law.
The Indian bill is a sweeping draft law that sets forth a regulatory framework for a
convergent media environment that is intended to remain valid over time, technologies
and industries. Like the German Information and Communication Services Act (LukDG), enacted in 1998, or the British White Paper proposing a cross-media regulatory authority
(OFCOM), published in 2000, the purpose of this legislation is to overcome an outdated
regime that treats media which performs the same function differently. For example,
the e-mail viewed via television is different compared to that read on a laptop.
|