According to Government of India, the total housing shortage during 12th Five-Year
Plan would be 18.78 million dwelling units (Smriti, 2013). Even though Central,
State and Local governments are taking necessary steps, still there is a large gap
between supply and demand of houses. At present, India needs to build many million
houses at right location with affordable price. Traditionally in India, buildings are
either load-bearing structures with appropriate roof or Reinforced Cement Concrete
(RCC) frame structures with infill masonry walls. With these conventional systems,
it is not possible to complete the construction with rapid speed and reduce the gap
between supply and demand of houses. Therefore, the industry must find an
alternative solution such as steel structures, composites structures and prefab technology for construction which has inherent advantages in terms of quality,
productivity, durability and cost.
RCC structures made with the use of concrete and steel are commonly used in
India for building constructions. Steel structures are made up of structural steel,
whereas composite structures are generally made up of three major elements, i.e.,
reinforced concrete, structural steel work and shear connection. Each of these
components makes its own contribution to strength and durability of the structure.
Composite construction practice is still at a very nascent stage in India, so its
effectiveness and applicability must be propagated for structures where fast-track
construction is of utmost importance promoting the cost-effective composite
construction (Ambadkar and Pajgade, 2012). In India, many consulting engineers
are reluctant to accept the use of composite steel concrete structures because of its
unfamiliarity and complexity in its analysis and design. But the literature says that if
properly configured, then composite steel concrete system can provide extremely
economical structural systems with high durability, rapid erection and superior seismic
performance characteristics (Panchal and Marathe, 2011). Different structural systems
have various advantages and disadvantages. Attempts on construction cost
comparison for various structural systems have been made to identify the costeffective
system. But due to the complexity of building construction, no
comprehensive study on this topic has been done. Earlier studies include comparison
of a few trial designed buildings and comparison of real projects (Li and Robert,
2004). Different structural systems can be effective in different projects depending
upon the nature and specification of the project. The objective of the study is to
study the time and cost comparison of construction of RCC, steel and composite
steel structure building. The analysis for each alternative was done by considering
three parameters, i.e., sizing of members, material quantities and time of construction.
The study was intended to help the decision makers in choosing the most economical
structural system for a project.
|