There was, for many years, a vigorous debate among scholars about the nature
of civil society in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Is it robust and relatively
autonomous? Or is it cowed and controlled by the communist party-state?
Optimists argued that the party-state does not just tolerate but actually
encourages civic engagement.1 Specifically, they trumpeted the dramatic proliferation
of organizations outside the established bureaucracy to promote and help carry out
different policies. In 1988, the Chinese party-state reported that there were fewer
than 4,500 ‘social organizations’ registered to operate in that country; nearly twoand-
a-half decades later, in 2012, there were 492,000. This includes three
subcategories: social groups (shehui tuanti, of which there were 268,000), civil
non-enterprise institutions (minban fei qiye danwei; 221,000), and foundations (jijinhui;
about 3,000); but it does not include the many NGOs that are legally registered as
businesses, or the significant (but contested) number of unregistered, truly grassroots
organizations.
Pessimists, on the other hand, focused on the fact that many of China’s NGOs
are actually ‘GONGOs’, Governmentally Organized Non-Governmental Organizations
under the thumb of state agencies and party officials.3 Although they are being
relaxed in pilot programs in designated jurisdictions, the rules for civic activism
generally remain quite restrictive. To operate legally, NGOs must not only register
with the Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA), they also must obtain a government-affiliated
sponsor (guakao danwei), a so-called ‘mother-in-law’, which is then responsible for
the NGO’s behavior. In addition, groups can only register with the local MCA bureau
in the jurisdiction where they are based, thereby prohibiting affiliations across
geographic regions.
|