Branches are the principal interface between banks and public and as such play an important
role in financial intermediation to support the economic activities of the state. The distribution
of branches within and across districts in a state defines markets for financial services, because
branches are where deposits are mobilized and credit facilities arranged. If banking markets
were to become more concentrated through the process of branch expansion, small firms and
marginalized people who live in unbanked areas may suffer. If more branches were increasingly
sited in affluent districts, the distribution of income and wealth could become more unequal.
Banks’ decision to open a new branch at a particular location is driven by many factors.
From the banks’ perspective, to be able to deliver those important services to firms and individuals,
banks must be profitable over time; their choice of location of new branches is surely based on
the expected returns and business potential. However, in India, banks are constrained to open
certain percentage of branches in unbanked and under-banked areas to ensure equitable
distribution of branches and facilitate financial inclusion. Subject to those constrains, banks
still have the freedom to choose the location and hence it can be reasonably expected that the
choice of location of new branches would be influenced by a mix of factors such as the level of
economic activities, level of existing banking facilities, business potential, level of financial
inclusion, and presence of unbanked areas.
In view of the above, this paper empirically investigates the level of concentration of branches
in Kerala and how it has changed over time. Further, the paper investigates how various
socioeconomic factors influence a bank’s choice of location for opening new branches at
district level.
|