The Theory of Constraints (TOC), a relatively new management philosophy, proposed
by Goldratt and Cox (1992), is based on effective use of system’s constraints. The
TOC’ philosophy stresses that a system’s outputs are determined by its constraint(s).
Goldratt proposed Five Focusing Steps (FFS) process for managing constraints and
continuously improving any system. The TOC FFS are:
- IDENTIFY the system’s constraint(s), whether physical or policy constraint.
- Decide how to EXPLOIT the system’s constraint(s), i.e., get the best possible
from the limit of the current constraint(s); reduce the effects of the current
constraint(s); and make everyone aware of the constraint(s) and its effects on
the performance of the system.
- SUBORDINATE everything else to the above decision, i.e., avoid keeping
non-constraint resources busy doing unneeded work.
- ELEVATE the system’s constraint(s), i.e., offload some demand or expand
capability.
- If in the previous steps a constraint has been broken, go back to Step 1, but
do not allow INERTIA to cause a system constraint.
Determining the product-mix for a given period of time is one of the important
production decisions. The objective is to utilize the limited resources to maximize the
net value of the output from the production facilities. The product-mix decision is
dependent upon the production capacities of facilities, demand for various products,
and the sales revenue and costs associated with each product. Traditionally, Linear
Programming (LP) is used to solve the product-mix problem. The product-mix problem
has been discussed in the TOC literature since Goldratt (1990) first reported it with
the example of the simple P’s and Q’s problem (where P and Q are products in productmix).
Many researchers have compared the TOC heuristic with LP and found that the
former gives optimal results (Luebbe and Finch, 1992; and Patterson, 1992). The TOC
heuristic uses the ratio of Contribution Margin (CM) to the processing time on the
bottleneck as the production priority (Patterson, 1992). Plenert (1993) concluded that
the TOC heuristic did not provide an optimal or even feasible solution for product-mix
problems with multiple constrained resources. Fredendall and Lea (1997) revised the
traditional TOC algorithm for multiple constrained resources product-mix problem.
Aryanezhad and Komijan (2004) showed disadvantages of the revised algorithm of
Fredendall and Lea (1997) and proposed an improved algorithm for multiple constrained
resources product-mix problem. They concluded that multiple resource constrained
product-mix problem is like a Multiple Objective Decision-Making (MODM) problem
and each bottleneck contributes to the decision-making process. This study tries to
further extend the conclusions of Aryanezhad and Komijan (2004) and proposes a
Mixed Integer Linear Goal Programming (MILGP) model for solving multiple
constrained resources product-mix problem.
|