IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of English Studies :
Teaching the Rationale of Reading Critically at the Advanced Level
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The research conducted over the last three decades has changed our view of reading as a mere process of decoding. Grabe describes reading as an … active process of comprehending [where] students need to be taught strategies to read more efficiently (e.g., guess from context, define expectations, make inferences about the text, skim ahead, etc. (1991, p. 377). This means that one does not read all the sentences in the same way, but one relies on a number of ‘cues’ to get an idea of what kind of sentence or an explanation that is likely to follow. Moreover, Krashen’s (1981) hypotheses on language acquisition have greatly influenced the research and practice in reading comprehension, and in particular the effect of “the Schema Theory.” Specific attention is paid to interactive approaches to reading, which argue that reading comprehension is a combination of identification and interpretation skills. Grabe (1991) lists the five most important areas of current research which are still prominent: “schema theory, language skills and automaticity, vocabulary development, comprehension strategy training, and reading-writing relations” (p. 375). The paper aims at discussing in brief the tenets of reading comprehension, the cognitive tasks involved in reading as well as the various activities teachers use in teaching reading comprehension.

 
 
 

Reading can be seen as an “interactive” process between a reader and a text which leads to automaticity or (reading fluency). In this process, the reader interacts dynamically with the text as he tries to elicit the meaning and where various kinds of knowledge are being used: linguistic or systemic knowledge (through bottom-up processing) as well as schematic knowledge (through top-down processing). According to Crystal (2007), reading is “appreciating the sense of what is written: we read for meaning” (p. 209). In other words, the ultimate goal of reading is not the process of reading itself, but the unraveling of the meaning represented by the words, phrases, and sentences. Sometimes, “reading between the lines” is demanded. In the latter case, the association between the letter and the sound does not often play a crucial role.

Since reading is a complex process, Grabe argues that “many researchers attempt to understand and explain the fluent reading process by analyzing the process into a set of component skills” (1991, p. 379) in reading; consequently researchers proposed at least six general component skills and knowledge areas:
1. Automatic recognition skills;
2. Vocabulary and structural knowledge;
3. Formal discourse structure knowledge;
4. Content/world background knowledge;
5. Synthesis and evaluation skills/strategies; and
6. Meta-cognitive knowledge and skills monitoring.

Carrell and Eisterhold (1983) outline the processes involved in this interactive process where both bottom-up and top-down processings occur simultaneously at all levels.

 
 
 

English Studies Journal, Teaching, Rationale, Reading Critically, Advanced Level, the Schema Theory, Automatic recognition skills, Vocabulary, structural knowledge.