The Indian Independence Act, 1947 passed by the British Parliament had the effect of setting up the erstwhile British territory in India into two independent Dominions, Pakistan and India, which consequently became sovereign state, freeing the former princely states of India, including Kashmir, from the suzerainty of Britain. The princely states were, for internal purposes, outside the administrative, legislative and judicial control of the British India Government but were subject to the paramountacy of the British crown. The princely states which were thus freed from suzerainty became independent sovereign states. Kashmir became an independent sovereign state with effect from August 15, 1947. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 contained in Section 2 (4) a provision in terms of which the freed princely states could join either India or Pakistan. Several princely states, except the states of Junagadh, Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir, were persuaded by the then Governor- General Lord Mountbatten to enter into a relationship before the actual date of transfer of power, by executing an Instrument of Accession on three subject matters, viz., defence, external affairs and communication. Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir executed the Instrument of Accession, an international treaty, on October 26, 1947 with Dominion of India. Article 7 of the Instrument of Accession was specific that Jammu and Kashmir was not committed to the acceptance of any future Constitution of India unless specifically accepted in terms of Article 5 of the Instrument of Accession. In other words, it was clear that the treaty relationship required a modification through a supplementary instrument, detailing the modified relationship. Against this backdrop, an attempt has been made in this paper to analyze the legal implications of the Instrument of Accession. |