IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management :
The Development of Knowledge in Portugal: A Slow and Unsustainable Progress
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Development of knowledge in Portugal occurred late and slowly, mainly as a result of political and institutional factors which persisted with democracy. Among the key knowledge areas, education, Research and Development (R&D), and innovation advanced with frequent setbacks. This irregular behavior induced very negative economic and social consequences, given the spillover and multiplier effects arising from those areas. Significant progress took place at the onset of the 21st century, despite the lack of a systematic knowledge strategy that would guarantee consistent articulation between key areas and stakeholders. Important imbalances have thus been taking place which severely challenge knowledge regulation process, in which public policies have played an essential role. However, despite the ratification of EU Strategy 2020, the Portuguese government has drastically been diminishing support to education and R&D over the last years, as a consequence of the austerity program, thereby leading, with other factors, to the now visible regression in the development of knowledge.

 
 
 

When compared to the other European countries, as well as a significant number of OECD countries, Portugal can be considered as a relative latecomer in terms of creating the foundations of modern knowledge. We will examine, in brief, the reasons for this delay, showing how the transition from the 20th to the 21st century was an important moment for Portugal in terms of recuperation in the key areas of the creation and development of knowledge: education, Research and Development (R&D), and innovation.

This late development naturally meant that the effects of globalization and the economic and social crisis would be felt stronger in Portugal than in the other economies with solid background of technology and knowledge, as it lacked sufficiently strong scientific and institutional infrastructure and was, to a large degree, dependent on imported technology and knowledge. This could have been partially avoided if anti-cyclical policies had been adopted in time in the three key areas mentioned above. However, this did not occur mainly on account of the austerity measures.

Whereas in some areas, the effect of cutbacks was less onerous, as they are essentially short-term and bear less spillover effects, the opposite is the case for the development of knowledge. Effectively, this process is characterized by the cross-effects established over time, by the accumulative nature and self-reinforcement of its results, by the boom and bust repercussions seen in the diverse economic sectors and social areas, and also by the fact that most of the ongoing economic and social effects will only be in place in the long term. As specialized literature on this subject has shown, delays in terms of educational reforms, for example, have been reflected by an increased negative impact on economic and social growth and development, in terms of time and intensity. The same occurs with delays in R&D and innovation.

 
 
 

Knowledge Management Journal, Development of Knowledge, Research and Development (R&D), Portugal, European Union (EU), Economics of Knowledge, Regulation of Knowledge, Slow and Unsustainable Progress.