IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development :
Promoting Firms Within the Cluster: A Policy Experience of the Sports Goods Cluster at Jalandhar
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Clusters have been in existence in India for centuries and are famous for their products at both national and international levels. Cluster is an important source of employment creation as well as economic growth. In recent years, particular attention has been paid to the development of industrial cluster. The present study attempts to review various policies designed by the government for the development of sports goods cluster at Jalandhar by analyzing the various policies issued by the government for the cluster. The government is not found to be active in the cluster, and very few initiatives were taken up by the government for the development of the cluster. The findings suggest that the government should redefine its policies to ensure the growth of the cluster.

 
 
 

In the past few decades, clusters have attracted the attention of both academicians and politicians. Porter (2003) stated that the existence of one or several regional clusters is regarded as a prerequisite for regional prosperity. Since the end of 1980s, national and local governments of Germany, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, and France have attempted to foster their development. A typical defense of cluster policies is that cluster brings economic gains and should therefore receive public support (Sahngan, 2012).

An industry cluster can be defined as a group of related firms, industries or suppliers and various institutions located at a particular place. Alfred Marshall gave the first clear description of industry clusters and conducted a study on the Lancashire Cutlery Industry and Sheffield Steel Industry and noted that there was a tendency among the specialized companies to cluster together in such a way that it produced geographic concentration of activities, which he called ‘industrial districts’. Marshall observed how “great are the advantages which people following the same skilled trade get from near neighboring to each other.” The agglomeration of similar or related firms generates a number of external economies which lead to decrease in the cost for cluster producers. Such economies include a group of specialized workers, facile availability of suppliers and hasty transmission of new knowledge. The concentration of similar firms attracts and obtains benefits from a group of labor possessing common skills. The risk of individual worker is less by locating at a place where lots of employment opportunities are procurable. Further, the group of firms present in the cluster motivates the suppliers to locate at a place where readymade market is available. There is quick dissemination of ideas and knowledge as the ideas can easily move from one firm to another.

 
 
 

Entrepreneurship Development Journal, Promoting Firms, Cluster, Sports Goods Cluster, Lancashire Cutlery Industry, Sheffield Steel Industry, Michael E Porter, Sports Goods Cluster, Jalandhar.