IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Applied Finance
Lead-Lag Relationship and Price Discovery in Indian Commodity Derivatives and Spot Market: An Example of Pepper
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

This study examines the lead-lag relationship and price discovery process between spot and futures market of pepper in India by employing Johansen’s cointegration test and the bivariate VECM-EGARCH(1, 1) models. Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) tests are used to check the stationarity of the price series. The study finds that spot market absorbs the information faster than futures market, and therefore, the former plays a significant role in the price discovery process.

 
 
 

In India, agricultural products market is regulated at different levels: local, state and national. The prices of agricultural commodities have been of concern to different regulators. The Forward Market Commission (FMC), which has the authority and responsibility to ensure that the prices of agricultural commodities are not manipulated, has the power to determine the commodities which need varieties of price discovery mechanisms. Derivative products are permitted in certain commodities under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, but were banned at different points of time only to be restarted in 2003. Since then commodity futures trading has been an important instrument in the price determination process.

Price discovery is one of the prominent economic functions of derivatives market—it helps in pricing cash or spot transactions based on the prices of futures market. Establishing reference price from which the spot prices are formed is a crucial issue in price discovery, and this requires an understanding of whether spot or futures market absorbs the new information set (Gardbade and Silber, 1982). Theoretically, in an efficient market system, the price of an asset should move simultaneously to spot and futures markets. This is because in an efficient market, new information should be captured simultaneously by both the markets. Due to the fact that the futures price is the price determined in an agreement (futures contract) to supply a specified quantity of a commodity, there will be a close relationship between the prices of futures contract and spot prices (Hernandez and Torero, 2010). In particular, according to the non-arbitrage theory, there is a clear relationship between spot and futures market. As per the cost-of-carry relationship theory, price movements in spot and futures market are highly influenced by a common set of information and hence the law of one price should be active (Hasbrouck 1995), and if there is a mismatch between the price of two markets and the law of one price does not hold, such deviation is attributed to transaction cost (Protopapadakis and Stoll, 1983 and Goodwin, 1990). However, due to several market frictions and market microstructure effects, there will be disparity in the price of an asset in spot and futures markets. Since the cost of trading in derivatives market is comparatively less than the spot market, the ‘informed’ traders may act first in the derivatives market and therefore price difference may exist in the spot and futures market.

 
 
 

Applied Finance Journal, Forward Market Commission (FMC), National Commodities and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX), Major Market (MM), Lead-Lag Relationship, Price Discovery, Indian Commodity Derivatives, Spot Market, Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF), Phillips-Perron (PP) Example of Pepper.