IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of International Relations :
The Role of India in Regionalism: SAARC, ASEAN, EU, BIMSTEC, IOR-ARC, and MGC: Lessons for Nigeria in the ECOWAS
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The paper examines India’s role in regionalism. Even though India’s closest regional setting is within the subcontinent of Asia and its vehicle of regional integration is the South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC), it has not hesitated to actively engage and/or take advantage of opportunities in successful regionalisms such as Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), European Union (EU) and in subregional structures such as the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIM-STEC), the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC), the Mekong Ganga Cooperation (MGC). Since the end of the Cold War and following its economic reforms, India has stepped up its relations with these regional and subregional organizations and their member countries with the aim of strengthening economic growth through better trade and investment links, security and stability, and most importantly with a view to increasing its global standing. The paper concludes by drawing lessons for Nigeria from the Indian experience of regionalism. The lessons are even more imperative against the backdrop of Nigeria’s recent emergence as the largest economy in Africa and its quest to join the top 20 largest economies in the world in line with its vision 2020.

 
 
 

India has always considered regional cooperation as an important aspect of its foreign policy. The search for a larger Asian identity and role was integral to India’s freedom struggle from the start.1 Even before India achieved formal independence, it had hosted an Asian Relations Conference in 1947. India later held a conference on Indonesia in 1949. Its earlier efforts were expanded further to produce the Afro-Asian Nation’s Conference at Bandung in 1955 and the establishment of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) in 1961. The policies of Non-Alignment and Principles of Peaceful Coexistence or Panchsheel associated with Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru have had a major influence on India’s relations with its immediate and extended neighborhood. Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was convinced that the Asian states needed to form a strong common identity, and noted that they had the capacity to work together for their common future. Nehru was also convinced that India had a key role to play in the emerging regionalisms within India’s immediate and extended neighborhood.

No doubt India stands out in Asia apparently because of the size of its population, military, economic growth, and its growing interest in playing a role in international affairs. For instance, India accounts for 75% of the population of South Asia, 65% of its total area and 78% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP).2 In terms of location, India also has centrality in South Asia, in that while it has borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, they do not have borders with each other. This gives India regional advantages as well as disadvantages as the smaller states either try to obstruct or counterbalance India or seek countervailing external help from outside the region from countries such as the Republic of China.

 
 
 

International Relations Journal, South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC), ASEAN, EU, Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIM-STEC), Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC), Mekong Ganga Cooperation (MGC), Nigeria, ECOWAS, India in Regionalism.