IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
A Guided Tour | Recommend | Links | Subscriber Services | Feedback | Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Law Review :
Rethinking the Limits of State Action Concept in India in the Light of Globalization: Lessons from the US
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Globalization has transformed the concept of ‘statehood’. A number of public functions have now fallen into the hands of private sector because of the governments’ policy of liberalization. Unlike in the past, the realization of fundamental rights is a task which lies with the government as well as private sectors. But Article 12 which defines State for the purpose of enforcement of fundamental rights is constrained in a set of narrow doctrines evolved from time to time and this poses a threat to the enforcement of fundamental rights against private rights when their act violates the fundamental rights of the citizens. In this background, the authors compare the respective situation in the United States wherein the state action depends on a more realistic and flexible criterion on the basis of case-to-case analysis.

 
 
 

Globalization is the buzzword of today. No other concept has ever influenced the various spheres of human activity as it does. In the political sphere, the concept of Statehood has undergone a drastic change ever since the emergence of globalization.1 With globalization, liberalization and privatization, there is the emergence of significant forms of political authority outside the traditional focus on the public institutions of the State and that the actors and institutions of global economy are increasingly setting the terms for the conduct of social life.2 For some, globalization and its accompanying reconfiguration of political power amounts to nothing less than the demise of the paradigm of modernity making untenable the idea of nation state as the main organizing principle of society.3

The reconfiguration of the relationship between the state, private actors and the individuals due to liberalization, globalization and privatization has pumped in various socioeconomic changes in the society like disinvestment, decentralization, public-private partnership, etc. Besides globalization, economic liberalization and privatization have put constitutional principles in a state of dilemma. Principles of democracy, concept of welfare state, social and economic justice embodied under Part IV of the Constitution, concept of federalism, etc. are undergoing a constant process of reshaping in order to match with the developmental activities from time to time.4 Similarly, it has resulted in the emergence of a new era of ‘legal pluralism’ wherein there will be a direct confrontation between the sacrosanct fundamental rights on the one hand and self-interest of the private persons on the other.5 In this scenario, the concept of justice, fairness and reasonableness is not the sole responsibility of the government alone and the government alone cannot be said to be the repository acting in public interest while performing public functions and duties according to the paradigm of legal pluralism.

 
 
 

Law Review Journal, Rethinking, Limits of State Action Concept, India, Light, Globalization, Lessons, Globalization, Statehood, State Action, US Constitution, Civil Rights Cases, Concept of State Action in India, US.