Today’s dynamic manufacturing environment is characterized by dramatic and often
unanticipated changes. In this difficult and challenging milieu, the manufacturing
enterprise must develop and implement new and innovative strategies for competitive
success. Companies need to make quick decisions and should work as a whole to
make strategic decisions and to gain competitive advantage. Analytic Hierarchy Process
(AHP) (Saaty, 1980) is one of the very popular decision-making methods used to solve
complicated problems that include multiple criteria. AHP allows decision makers to
model the complicated problems in a hierarchical structure having the main target,
criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives and the relationships among these. The most
important characteristics of AHP is combining knowledge, experience, individual
opinions and foresights in a logical way.
Vendors have always been an integral part of a company’s management policy.
Furthermore, when firms are allocating more resources to their core competencies and
encouraging the outsourcing of non-core activities, they have more reliance and
dependence on suppliers. It is increasingly important that companies have strong
relationship with their suppliers to stay ahead of competition. The establishment,
development and maintenance of the relationship between exchange partners are
crucial to achieving success. In the current international competitive environment,
many manufacturers are focusing on supplier management as a means for achieving
sustainable competitive advantage. Supplier management may be defined as organizing
the optimal flow of high-quality of material or components to manufacturing companies
in time from a suitable set of innovative suppliers. It is crucial for several reasons.
Suppliers can have significant influence on a manufacturer’s performance through
their contribution to cost reduction, new product design and enabling the constant
improvement of quality. Consequently, studies of supply chain management are now
increasingly concentrating on the relationships involved between organizations and
the suppliers rather than the traditional physical flow of materials and products. The
supplier selection and evaluation processes draw even more concern from scholars
and practitioners. Many scholars have argued about what criteria should be considered
when selecting and evaluating suppliers and the importance of each criterion in the
process. Along with the development of supply chain management philosophy, a range
of criteria evolved, but three core items are still to be used, viz., cost, quality and
delivery performance.
|