The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (or Basel Committee in short) plays a leading
role in standardizing bank regulations across jurisdictions. The Basel committee’s primary
objective is strengthening the bank’s capital to improve the banking sector’s ability to deal
with financial and economic stress, improve risk management and strengthen the banks’
transparency. This is defined in terms of the Capital Adequacy Ratio, i.e., Capital to Risk
weighted Assets Ratio (CAR or CRAR). Basel I introduced the concept of capital adequacy.
Basel II stands on three pillars – first pillar: minimum capital requirements; second pillar:
supervisory review, and third pillar: market discipline. The first pillar mainly stressed upon
the denominator, i.e., risk weighted assets, and gave various measures to optimally assess the
level of risk that the bank is exposed to. The second pillar is a regulatory response to the first
pillar, giving regulators better ‘tools’ over those previously available. It also provides a
framework for dealing with those risks which are not completely covered in the first one. The
third pillar aims to complement the minimum capital requirements and supervisory review
process by developing a set of disclosure requirements which allows the market participants
to gauge the capital adequacy of the banks. Once some of the loopholes of Basel II got exposed
during the financial crisis that struck most of the economies towards the end of the first
decade of the 21st century, the Basel committee members shifted their attention to the
numerator of the CRAR, i.e., the capital. The definition of eligible capital has been grossly
changed under Basel III.
|