In strategic management, firms create competitive advantage either by picking resources or
building capabilities. Those capabilities that are firm-specific can be sources of advantage,
and as such they should be built up, organized and protected. This approach is called ‘dynamic
capabilities’ in order to emphasize the exploitation of existing internal and external companyspecific
competencies to address changing environments (Teece et al., 1997). The framework
is based on the development of managerial competencies and difficult-to-imitate mixtures
of executive, functional and technological skills. It also integrates and draws on research in
administration of R&D, product and process development, transfer of technology, intellectual
ability, manufacturing, human resource management and organizational learning.
There have been many studies defining dynamic capabilities and arguing why they can be
a source of competitive advantage for a company (Barney, 1991; Constance, 1997; Eisenhardt
and Martin, 2000; and Blyler and Coff, 2003). Dynamic capabilities have been found to represent a specific type of knowledge (Makadok, 2001; and Malik and Kotabe, 2009). However,
further implications that derive from the knowledge aspect of dynamic capabilities have not
been analyzed. For instance, one of the key attributes of knowledge, according to numerous
studies, is geographical-localization that implies that knowledge flourishes in specific locations
(Jaffe et al., 1993; Zucker et al., 1998a; and Keller, 2002). Therefore, dynamic capabilities,
being a special type of knowledge, must be geographically bounded.
|