The Phillips curve, which represents the correlation between unemployment and
inflation, was first presented by Phillips (1958) and was adjusted by Phelps (1967) and Friedman
(1968), to include the structured expectations in its framework.
The Phillips short-term curve
enables substituting unemployment with unexpected inflation (defined as actual inflation
with expectations removed) and creates positive/negative correlation for inflation
expectations/inflation rate. In this framework, the increase in inflation beyond expectations causes
temporary erosion of real wages and following this, a temporary demand for
employment and a decrease in the unemployment rate. Alternatively, it can be said that an increase
in the price of products leads manufacturers to erroneous decisions, due to gaps in
information. According to this explanation, as long as manufacturers do not know if the price
increase reflects an increase in the general level of prices or a relative increase, they choose the
path of compromise and increase manufacturing only partially (compared to that which is
requisite with relative price increases).
According to the rational expectations theory, average unexpected inflation in the
long-term is not probable, and therefore, the long-term Phillips curve is perfectly
inelastic. In other words, every change in the long-term money supply will generate an
inflation reaction, but will not decrease the unemployment rate or increase the production.
The assumption of no substitution (or neutrality of money) in the long-term has been
studied in a large number of empirical studies, and is indeed, the prevailing view in current
economic literature. |