There
are no regulatory constraints in the existing system. However, there does exist
some regulatory overlap, if interest rate hedging products have to be popularized
and more liquidity has to be imparted. Currently, interest rate futures are present
as a product class, but the biggest participants (banks) that can make use of
the same, can only hedge. On a government security portfolio which they have purchased,
that means they can only sell futures and cannot trade them in the same way they
can trade in the government securities. Given such a scenario, the RBI regulates
the banks which are the dominant participants to trade such products and Securities
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulates the exchange and markets which offer
the platform for such trading.
Developing liquidity in these markets requires
two fold actionone that the RBI allows banks to trade freely in such products
and secondly, SEBI to allow more participants like Foreign Institutional Investments
(FIIs), just like in equity markets. Other regulators like Pension Fund Regulatory
and Development Authority (PFRDA), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
(IRDA) etc., can also put in respective guidelines amongst their participants.
Such exchange-based products will translate into liquid hedging products for interest
rates and the retail investors can take the advantage of this. For e.g., a deep
and a liquid interest rate futures market can be used to hedge a floating home
loan borrower. Apart from this, RBI can also take active steps to introduce other
interest rate hedging tools like interest rate options, as per the Jaspal Bindra
Committee Report (2003) on Interest Rate Derivatives. Today, banks are very savvy
on hedging interest rate risk and they are well capable of using such products.
Moreover, they are allowed to use such products with regard to their foreign currency
borrowing. Thus, I believe that they would do well to hedge interest rates in
the Indian context.
|