Creating a `mold' assumes an element of control, where the subject's
passivity is cast into an imagean image that is strengthened and cemented through
conformity. This act of `imaging' implies external agents like society, men,
writers, priests, institutions and so on, where the whole process is based upon
projection, reflection, imitation and an act of symbolizing. In other words,
it is an imposition and is never devoid of a power structure.
Myth and history are two major hegemonic structures having gender dimensions.
As Jasbir Jain (2002a) puts it, "myth marginalizes women, history excludes
them". To begin with Aristotle's Politics,1 for example, women
have been compared to slaves. Women belonged to the world of nature and chaos
while men represented order and civilization. The earlier myths have inevitably
portrayed the woman as either the source of temptation or the agent of procreation.
Both history and myth have allowed women restricted role models, reinforcing
inequalities and discriminations. To put it in Virginia Woolf's words, "for
most of history, Anonymous was a woman".
The `desire to break, transgress, rupture or transform' the notion of the `pre-set
forms, conventions, practices, discourses and stereotypes', thereby creating a more open
or `evolving' identity, suggests a constructive processan approach that aims at
shattering the rigid and opaque boundaries of the `container' called `mold'. Since the
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary defines `mold' as a "particular style showing
the characteristics, attitudes or behavior that are typical of somebody or something",
the idiomatic expression `breaking the mold' would denote an `original way' that would
change people's expectations from a situation. |