|
Bank Asset-Liability Management (ALM) may be defined as the simultaneous
planning of all asset and liability positions on the bank's balance sheet, by taking into
consideration the different bank management objectives and legal, managerial and market
constraints, for the purpose of enhancing the value of the bank, providing liquidity, and
mitigating interest rate risk (Gup and Brooks, 1993). An efficient ALM system aims to manage
the volume, mix, maturity, rate sensitivity, quality and liquidity of the assets and liabilities
as a whole, so as to earn a predetermined, acceptable risk-reward ratio.
The framework of ALM broadly covers the area of interest rate risk, liquidity
risk, exchange risk and credit risk. ALM can be defined as an operation for assessing the
above-mentioned risks, actively altering the asset-liability portfolio, and for strategically
taking actions and managing risks with the objective of maximizing profits. ALM is not
limited to only on balance sheet assets and liabilities such as deposits and lending, but
also includes off-balance sheet activities such as swaps, futures and options. The objective
of ALM is to make banks fully prepared to face the emerging challenges.
The present study proposes a linear programming model for ALM, with
profitability as the objective, and constraints based on liquidity and statutory requirements. The
model was applied to a sample of banks operating in India, resulting in a recommended
optimal asset-liability mix of the banks in the sample. Using these results, the study assessed
the nature of ALM of different bank groups, in terms of its implications on
profitability, liquidity, and interest rate sensitivity.
There is a considerable literature addressing ALM in banks. One of the key
motivators of ALM worldwide was the Basel Committee. The Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision (2001) formulated broad supervisory standards and guidelines
and recommended statements of best practice in banking supervision. The purpose of
the committee was to encourage global convergence toward common approaches
and standards. In particular, the Basel II (2004) norms were proposed as an
international standard for the amount of capital that banks need to set aside to guard against the
type of financial and operational risks they face. Basel II proposed setting up rigorous risk
and capital management requirements designed to ensure that a bank holds capital
reserves appropriate to the risk the bank exposes itself to through its lending and
investment practices. Generally speaking, these rules mean that the greater the risk to which the
bank is exposed, the greater the amount of capital the bank needs to hold to safeguard
its solvency and overall economic stability. This would ultimately help protect
the international financial system from the types of problems that might arise should a
major bank or a series of banks collapse. |