The literature on prediction of share price movements is quite vast and it has been the
focus of academicians, brokers, brokerage houses, investment bankers, treasury personnel,
researchers, and common households.1
There are fundamentalists who believe that it is the performance indicators that drive
share prices of companies. There are technical analysts who only look at patterns in
historic price movements and believe that market price discounts everything and history
repeats itself. If people genuinely believed that share prices cannot be predicted at all, then
large multinational fund managers and investment bankers would have found it difficult
to survive (Murphy, 1986). However, there is no specific method by which movement of
share prices can be predicted with certainty.
Even a probabilistic approach may not hold
good. It is indeed random and is the basic contention of the Efficient Market Hypothesis
(Fama, 1970). Researchers, however, never give up hope and keep on trying novel methods
for prediction. Sophisticated methods are used to analyze the data and generate insights.2
Besides trying to predict the movement of share prices, the literature has developed
various indicators and structures, which have formed the basis of valuation, ex ante.3
That is, instead of analyzing price movements, it has provided methods to judge whether
market prices reflect true value. These are important for making investment decisions, formergers and acquisitions, for portfolio valuation, and for measurement of risk, which is
essential for risk management. This paper deals with one such structure that is provided
by the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). |